Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 23:05 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Anthony W.
Youngman:
Hi Anthony,
> >> >I think that's a pretty usual setup (most people I know have a 32bit
> >> >version
> >> >of Linux installed on their laptop even though their CPU is actually
> >> >64bit).
> >
> >Sometimes it mak
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 11:18 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
Branch is not helpful, a separate repo has the advantage of
allowing a simple 'git clone' (like it's meant to be)
to get either one, without getting 't
Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people *with*
Windows machines, not from the actual machines themselves)
As I understand it, people with Windows can:
- run GUB
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:21:39AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 11:18 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> > Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
>
> Branch is not helpful, a separate repo has the advantage of
> allowing a
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:03:58AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
>
>> There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
>> LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people *with*
>> Windows machines, not from the actual mach
I tried to answer a question on -user but hit a brick wall.
\unfoldRepeats failed to work when the music block was funneled from 2
separate expressions. Can someone explain this to me? Why does the
following code work for voiceA but not for voiceB?
Thanks.
- Mark
2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
> Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
> downloaded .exe".
GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their
names.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.pacone
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 03:14 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Translators *do* need to get all of lily. At least, they need to
> get the docs (they translate this after the webpages, right?).
That's a good point. I was thinking, translation of docs is
an exception, but that'
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 03:14 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> > > What is it that bothers you tracking an additional repo?
> >
> > To be up-to-date, I need to do a "git pull origin"
>
> You should only n
I've been present for some months now on #lilypond at freenode.net,
so I've decided to mention the presence of this channel at
http://lilypond.org/web/about/index.html
The channel is owned by Simon Plante [cc], I've just asked him
for OPER so that we can make it a bit more official :-)
Greet
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 05:08 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> That would have been very useful to know six months ago, when I
> wrote the first draft of the CG and asked everybody to check it.
..didn't know about this then, I'm not much of a git guru.
> What should we do for p
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> I tried to answer a question on -user but hit a brick wall.
> \unfoldRepeats failed to work when the music block was funneled from 2
> separate expressions. Can someone explain this to me? Why does the
> following code work for voiceA but not
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
- does anybody feel like making cygwin packages for the missing
software?
Well, for some time I used to be the cygwin maintainer of lilypond.
Was quite nightmare.
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux ins
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, June 06, 2009 11:18 AM
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:03:58AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 05:08 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> > The actual experiments would be done on a separate branch -- but
> > only the initial experiments. Basically, I want to:
> > - merge web/ and
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 03:14 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
What is it that bothers you tracking an additional repo?
To be up-to-date, I need to do a "git pull origin"
You should only
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:46:10PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > I read the diff for CG when it came in this morning and the LSR stuff
> > looks good to me. If you want, we could also include the script I wrote
> > for checking all the sni
Continuing the thread from November 2007:
(see http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg32740.html )
Here is a Python hack that can add numbered notation (Chinese jianpu) to a line
of music. The numbered notation is added as ^\markup commands that include
appropriate EPS files. These
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 02:54:46PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham, here's a patch with the script for running and checking
> all of the lsr snippets.
ok. IMO, osx users should set up a "lilypond" shell script, as
suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need that special
path-to-bin
Does anybody remember which commit was used for 2.13.1? We should
tag that.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 6/5/09 12:18 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
> I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
I thought that the previous discussion was actually to separate the web from
the source, i.e., more, rather than less, separati
> Does anybody remember which commit was used for 2.13.1? We should
> tag that.
Isn't it this one?
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=e49c69e6d1e507f60348fa168332175ec6d42b0a
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lily
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 02:54:46PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Graham, here's a patch with the script for running and checking
all of the lsr snippets.
ok. IMO, osx users should set up a "lilypond" shell script, as
suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need t
I've done
make -f lilypond.make bootstrap
without problems, and
make lilypond
builds all the arches. The test output tarball is created, but it
fails the rsync test (?)
- (output from "make lilypond")
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/lilypond/gub'
PYTHONPATH=/home/lilypond/gub/tar
Hi guys,
Graham Percival a écrit :
Eventually, I'd like to have
docs/
docs/web/
docs/learning/
docs/reference/
docs/devel/
docs/snippets/
docs/examples/ (maybe)
with the approporiate translation files in each subdir.
John, if you're reading this: don't worry, I'm going to do
Francisco Vila a écrit :
2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe".
GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their
names.
Agreed. We
In a patch I submitted some days ago...
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blobdiff;f=ly/music-functions-init.ly;h=1910975f7fdc81ff7e3632d766f396a631f62f06;hp=2dded22e3d77acd2b2dbcab500d6a01a5f893be9;hb=269248a11ada074066deb061d64df70ee7b4deec;hpb=53c3276a6d56cf8866f7f813d8b53f639
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
I tried to answer a question on -user but hit a brick wall.
\unfoldRepeats failed to work when the music block was funneled from 2
separate expressions. Can someone explain this to me? Why does the
following code work for
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
>> Does anybody remember which commit was used for 2.13.1? We should
>
>> tag that.
>
> Isn't it this one?
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=e49c69e6d1e507f60348fa168332175ec6d42b0a
That is the commit that bumpe
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Francisco Vila a écrit :
>> 2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
>>
>>> Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
>>> downloaded .exe".
>>
>> GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
>> builder
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:18:41AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> fortunately, the involved changes in makefiles should not be
> too tricky... except for modifying "dist" target: it is
> problematic to release Lily sources with the website, so
> docs/web/ should be excluded from this target.
Wha
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 04:41:21PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> So, I'm sorry for the misstep, but I don't see why this happens.
> By comparison, I grepped for @code{\a and found this example in
> user/vocal.itely, line 168:
>
> Can someone explain why it works in one file but not in the other?
S
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> Which is kind of ridiculous if you're writing an ensemble piece with many
> (even more than one) voices/parts. How can a midi of a multi-voice work
> with any repeats be done?
I was working on a large score and originally kept the repeat
structu
> I made this change in music-functions-init.ly:
>
> -...@var{\addinstrumentdefinition}.")
> +...@code{\addinstrumentdefinition}.")
>
> However, the \a is still showing up as a control character 0x07,
> [...]
>
> Can someone explain why it works in one file but not in the other?
Documentation
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Silas Brown wrote:
> Continuing the thread from November 2007:
> (see http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg32740.html )
>
> Here is a Python hack that can add numbered notation (Chinese jianpu) to a
> line
> of music. The numbered notation is added
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> That is the commit that bumped the VERSION file.
> Graham wants to know which commit 2.13.1 is based on.
> For example, 2.13.0 was based on this commit:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=37a38d4a18943041e4d3623fb3996279f40df290
Ah, I see. We
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
>> Francisco Vila a écrit :
>>> 2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
>>>
Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe".
>>>
>>> GUB is the builder,
2009/6/7 Graham Percival :
> Err... "GUB" stands for "Grand Unified Binary". It was a play on
> the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) of physics.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=GUB&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-devel&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Aearly
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
2009/6/7 Patrick McCarty :
> Interesting. So did the name evolve over time? Now it appears to be
> called the Grand Unified Builder:
>
> http://lilypond.org/gub/
>
> -Patrick
see also
http://github.com/janneke/gub
or
http://lilypond.org/~janneke/vc/gub.git/
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (
39 matches
Mail list logo
