I totally agree, there is a problem with textual Tempo marks alignment.
I wanted to report this too, then I saw issues 684, 700 and now 712
reporting this, so I didn't. But since there are 3 unfixed issues
reporting the same thing and since the first one is open for 8 months
now, I allowed mys
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 09:37:19AM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> I wanted to report this too, then I saw issues 684, 700 and now 712
> reporting this, so I didn't. But since there are 3 unfixed issues
> reporting the same thing and since the first one is open for 8 months
> now, I allowed my
Jon,
You've put Linux-style bash shell commands to interpret this rule to
differentiate what to do for the midi and pf files
if ...
don't forget that on Windows you're dealing with the cmd command-line
interpreter rather than bash, so you may need to do a Windows-variant
version of this rule.
Am Samstag, 23. Mai 2009 13:34:12 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 09:37:19AM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> > PS : When I read this message again it looks a bit "offensive", this
> > wasn't my goal. I really appreciate the work of every of you and I think
> > lilypond is a extrao
2009/5/20 Francisco Vila :
> Maybe it's not that easy. If the right padding is intended to put the
> stencil to the rightmost side, the problem is that the extent of the
> brace (if any) is unknown at this moment.
And let's not forget that braces can have different sizes from one
system to another
Are you just talking about the if .. then conditional part? First I'll try
just commenting that whole thing out and see if it will compile, then I'll
try to figure out how to deliver the output to the right directories.
Thanks Ian,
Jon.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Jon,
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 23:46 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/5/20 Francisco Vila :
> > 2009/5/20 Francisco Vila :
> >> The key code is this. Given a (big) amount of time I could figure out
> >> how it works and try to improve it.
> >>
> >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blobd
2009/5/23 Joe Neeman :
> If I understand this correctly, you're suggesting that we pad each
> instrument name according to the largest (wrt X-extent) SystemStartXXX.
That's basically it, though the extent would be that of the greatest
number of stacked delimiters: for example, in the Haydn snippe
Thanks, Applied.
Valentin,
Can you change the status of 708 to fixed in 2.13.1? And verify, at your
convenience?
Thanks,
Carl
On 5/22/09 9:11 PM, "Andrew Hawryluk" wrote:
> This patch will allow convert-ly to process this:
>
> \version "2.11.0"
>
> {
> c d'4 ees
> \set Staff.keySignatur
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 23:38 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/5/23 Joe Neeman :
>
> > If I understand this correctly, you're suggesting that we pad each
> > instrument name according to the largest (wrt X-extent) SystemStartXXX.
>
> That's basically it, though the extent would be that of the grea
On 5/23/09 6:48 PM, "Joe Neeman" wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 23:38 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> 2009/5/23 Joe Neeman :
>>
>>> If I understand this correctly, you're suggesting that we pad each
>>> instrument name according to the largest (wrt X-extent) SystemStartXXX.
>>
>> That's basica
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:20:56PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> Can you change the status of 708 to fixed in 2.13.1? And verify, at your
> convenience?
Actually, the idea is that the programmer (or comitter) would
change the status to fixed, and Valentin would verify it when
2.13.1 GUB is rel
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 18:57 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> On 5/23/09 6:48 PM, "Joe Neeman" wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 23:38 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> >> A similar effect could be achieved by setting a negative value for
> >> 'padding (see attached image),
> >
> > Fair enough,
Hi Neil (et al),
I'm definitely talkin' out the back of my head here, but... =\
Can the instrument name blob take advantage of a "vertical skyline"
("profile"?) the way the rest of the notation (notes, etc.) take advantage of a
"horizontal skyline"? That would certainly solve the problem prec
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:20:56PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> Can you change the status of 708 to fixed in 2.13.1? And verify, at your
>> convenience?
>
> Actually, the idea is that the programmer (or comitter) would
> change the st
On 5/23/09 8:39 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:20:56PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>> Can you change the status of 708 to fixed in 2.13.1? And verify, at your
>>> convenience?
>>
>> Actually, the ide
On 5/23/09 8:26 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:20:56PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> Can you change the status of 708 to fixed in 2.13.1? And verify, at your
>> convenience?
>
> Actually, the idea is that the programmer (or comitter) would
> change the status t
17 matches
Mail list logo
