Willing to download, unroll, and RTFM, just, dont know where to start, a clue
or two would be appreciated.
Does the LY doc package include a specification for the language? BNF or
whatever?
Kinda need something like that to hope of making a GUI for it.
--
View this message in context:
http:
Francisco Vila-5 wrote:
>
> Hello, I've fixed and tested this in html NR. Looks good?
>
sorry, i don't know how to test or even if i can…
but i am even more sorry to tell you i found that the same "error" is also
present in the IR and LM!
hope this is not causing to much trouble!
thanks
-
1. You can't fully parse LilyPond without actually running LilyPond. At
least you need a Scheme parser.
2. You should use the lexer.ll and parser.yy files for creating you own
parser.
Danalute wrote:
Willing to download, unroll, and RTFM, just, dont know where to start, a clue
or two would b
2008/12/4 -Eluze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Francisco Vila-5 wrote:
>>
>> Hello, I've fixed and tested this in html NR. Looks good?
>>
>
> sorry, i don't know how to test or even if i can…
Well, it was targeted to the devel team and I CC-ed to you.
>
> but i am even more sorry to tell you i found
> It seems that the TeX backend should be removed completely now,
> since fonts are no longer available. Objections?
Since noone has objected I'm going to do this soon.
BTW, the same seems to be true for the `texstr' backend. I know, I
know, it was me who insisted on having this, but now lilyp
I wonder how we are going to get high-quality typesetting within
lilypond. This is a fundamental question: I think we shouldn't extend
lilypond so that it is contains a complete typesetting engine;
instead, we should rather look for alternatives.
I see two possibilities.
. We come to the conc
[pdflatex vs. latex + dvipdfmx]
> To summarize, could you show a practical example where your cases
> would be a problem?
Consider this simple Russian input:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
тест
\end{document}
pd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> I wonder how we are going to get high-quality typesetting within
> lilypond. This is a fundamental question: I think we shouldn't extend
> lilypond so that it is contains a complete typesetting en
On 12/3/08 6:33 PM, "Danalute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Willing to download, unroll, and RTFM, just, dont know where to start, a clue
> or two would be appreciated.
>
> Does the LY doc package include a specification for the language? BNF or
> whatever?
>
> Kinda need something lik
Werner LEMBERG schrieb:
I wonder how we are going to get high-quality typesetting within
lilypond. This is a fundamental question: I think we shouldn't extend
lilypond so that it is contains a complete typesetting engine;
instead, we should rather look for alternatives.
I see two possibilities.
> For example, look at the documentation of OrchestralLily:
> http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/orchestrallily.pdf
> http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/A-simple-example.html#A-simple-example
>
> The example on p.4 (displayed number; 8th page of the pdf) of the
> PDF has absolutely terrible ver
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> . We come to the conclusion that rendering with Pango is sufficient;
>in case there are still deficiencies we should improve interaction
>with Pango or ask the Pango people to implement what we need. If
>someo
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It seems that the TeX backend should be removed completely now,
>> since fonts are no longer available. Objections?
>
> Since noone has objected I'm going to do this soon.
>
> BTW, the same seems to be true for the `tex
> If we improve the deficiencies of Pango, there are many more
> applications that will benefit from this.
Well, `we' should report such issues again and again to the Pango
team :-)
For example, does Pango support TeX's paragraph handling algorithm
which is still the best available, AFAIK?
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>
> I wonder how we are going to get high-quality typesetting within
> lilypond.
>
Sorry to barge in with minimal understanding of the several years of
philosophy you have all seen develop here, but, please give me more of a
sense of how you mean 'typesetting'.
> Sorry to barge in with minimal understanding of the several years of
> philosophy you have all seen develop here, but, please give me more
> of a sense of how you mean 'typesetting'.
We are talking about typesetting text within lilypond, not music.
Werner
Francisco Vila-5 wrote:
>
> Well, it was targeted to the devel team and I CC-ed to you.
>
yes, but i still don't know where to find this *html NR* - probably it is my
problem not knowing to what you refer to in the following!? which link can i
access from windows and how? maybe i'll need some
I know this was brought up some years ago, and shotdown as basically going
against the grain, but I think it can be done, done well, and integrated
with benefit to all.
No problem with engraved music, but it isnt all that is needed. The
orchestra pit is far from the only place where music has a
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> typesetting text within lilypond
>
> Sometimes the music is an illustration set in flow of prose, I would hope
> that we would not be involved with the prose in that case.
>
> There are fragments of prose which annotate all staves that we must accept
> responsibilit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 6. Dezember 2008 00:38:21 schrieb Danalute:
> Tablature is the one I would address.
> \tabstaff is not acceptible as it stands; several issues have been recently
> noted on the Lute mailling list,
[...]
> I began to implement support for me
> There are fragments of prose which annotate all staves that we must
> accept responsibility for, but these are short, and dont usually
> involve display-font sizes. Can we not depend on whatever kerning
> tables are provided with the users-specified font?
What you say is basically valid for La
2008/12/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please, no. Virtually all of the engineering I've seen from LaTeX
> makes me want to cry,
Do you refer to engineering documents made with LaTeX, or to the
engineering of LaTeX itself?
If it is the former, what typesetting engine makes you happy to
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>
>
> You mean one tab staff and one mensural staff above each other? What's the
> problem with LilyPond? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here, because you
> can
> have a tab staff and a mensural staff in a staff group in LilyPond.
>
I understand I can mix stave typ
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Francisco Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/12/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Please, no. Virtually all of the engineering I've seen from LaTeX
>> makes me want to cry,
>
> Do you refer to engineering documents made with LaTeX, or to the
> engineeri
24 matches
Mail list logo
