On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . We come to the conclusion that rendering with Pango is sufficient; > in case there are still deficiencies we should improve interaction > with Pango or ask the Pango people to implement what we need. If > someone wants more, he or she should use lilypond-book. Arguably, > this is the way to go, at least for now, since it is simple and > straightforward (and it has already been added to lilypond).
If we improve the deficiencies of Pango, there are many more applications that will benefit from this. > . Use another, external typesetting library which can be linked to > lilypond. For example, there have been attempts to create such a > library for TeX. I have to dig out the details, but it sounds > interesting. Please, no. Virtually all of the engineering I've seen from LaTeX makes me want to cry, and as a project it moving glacially. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
