On 2009-09-30, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> You should probably change it back.
Thanks, reverted. I applied your fix for the translated docs as well.
-Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l
> -\gdef\lilyvindex#1{\doind{vr}{\code #1}\ignorespaces}
> +\gdef\lilyvindex#1{\doind{vr}{\code{#1}}\ignorespaces}
... and applied, thanks.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp
> @tex
> -\gdef\lilyvindex#1{\doind{vr}{\code #1}\ignorespaces}
> +\gdef\lilyvindex#1{\doind{vr}{\code{#1}}\ignorespaces}
> @end tex
Blush :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l
Patrick McCarty writes:
> On 2009-09-29, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On 2009-09-29, Graham Percival wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 06:26:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> > > Graham Percival writes:
>> > >
>> > > > l.2850 \entry {\code \"
>> > > >Uber die Nicht-Scha
> I *do* suspect there's a problem with the @lilyvindex macro, though.
I doubt that since I've basically duplicated code from texinfo.tex.
On the other hand, it is possible that the standard indexing macros
don't work well for non-ASCII stuff; this would indicate a generic
problem.
> But I can't
On 2009-09-29, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-09-29, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 06:26:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > > Graham Percival writes:
> > >
> > > > l.2850 \entry {\code \"
> > > >Uber die Nicht-Schachtelung von Klammern und
> > > >
On 2009-09-29, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 06:26:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Graham Percival writes:
> >
> > > l.2850 \entry {\code \"
> > >Uber die Nicht-Schachtelung von Klammern und
> > > Bindeb\"...
> >
> > It would appear that \code tak
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 06:26:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > l.2850 \entry {\code \"
> >Uber die Nicht-Schachtelung von Klammern und
> > Bindeb\"...
>
> It would appear that \code takes an argument, so the usual usage would
> be \code{..
Graham Percival writes:
> Attempting to build the docs ends apparently with an error in the
> German translations:
>
> ./notation.cps:2850: Argument of \" has an extra }.
>
> \par
>
>}
> \tclose ...n \rawbackslash \plainfrenchspacing #1}
>
Attempting to build the docs ends apparently with an error in the
German translations:
./notation.cps:2850: Argument of \" has an extra }.
\par
}
\tclose ...n \rawbackslash \plainfrenchspacing #1}
\null
\codex #
10 matches
Mail list logo
