Thank you Dan and Jean.
I'll do some experiments in the next few days and I'll update you.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:39 AM Dan Eble wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2022, at 04:43, Paolo Prete wrote:
> >
> > I need to execute the following automated test:
> > given a .ly file, I would like to check if the p
On Nov 14, 2022, at 04:43, Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> I need to execute the following automated test:
> given a .ly file, I would like to check if the produced output is what I
> expect it to be.
For checking the impact of LilyPond changes on my own scores, I use a
Docker container and a bash script
> Le 15 nov. 2022 à 01:08, Paolo Prete a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I need to execute the following automated test:
> given a .ly file, I would like to check if the produced output is what I
> expect it to be.
> Then I was thinking about a way to compare the output (doesn't matter if
> PDF or SVG
Hello,
I need to execute the following automated test:
given a .ly file, I would like to check if the produced output is what I
expect it to be.
Then I was thinking about a way to compare the output (doesn't matter if
PDF or SVG) with an expected image of the same file type, and check if the
two i
let 5/4 { \ottava #1 c'''8^>^\mf[(^\markup{ legato }\startTextSpan e''
> f''' g''' e'''']} c''''4\stopTextSpan \ottava #0 c'')
> }
> %%%
>
> On 2.19.83 the SVG output produces a collision on the OttavaBracket, which
> is not placed at the right outside-staff-priority order. The PDF output is
> ok. Is there a workaround/fix for this?
>
> thanks
Bracket.bracket-visibility = ##t
\override TupletBracket.direction = #UP
\tuplet 5/4 { \ottava #1 c'''8^>^\mf[(^\markup{ legato }\startTextSpan e''
f''' g''' e'''']} c''''4\stopTextSpan \ottava #0 c&#x
Paul
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:59:18 -0400, Paul Morris wrote:
> James,
>
> On 07/04/2018 09:41 AM, James Lowe wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:52:02 -0400, Paul Morris wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. It turned out I had a new SSH key that I hadn't added to
> >> Savannah yet. So I got it to work b
Paul Morris writes:
> Below is what I got, which doesn't match what you have above. Looks
> like I have ECDSA instead of RSA, or something?
>
> $ git pull --verbose
>
> The authenticity of host 'git.sv.gnu.org (208.118.235.201)' can't be
> established.
>
> ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:qRLLJ4
James,
On 07/04/2018 09:41 AM, James Lowe wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:52:02 -0400, Paul Morris wrote:
Thanks. It turned out I had a new SSH key that I hadn't added to
Savannah yet. So I got it to work by following CG 3.4.9
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/commit-a
Paul,
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:52:02 -0400, Paul Morris wrote:
> On 07/01/2018 02:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > Edit your .git/config file and change the repository address according
> > to the Git repository clone command given for developers on LilyPond's
> > Savannah page.
>
> Th
On 07/01/2018 02:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Edit your .git/config file and change the repository address according
to the Git repository clone command given for developers on LilyPond's
Savannah page.
Thanks. It turned out I had a new SSH key that I hadn't added to
Savannah yet. So I got i
"James Lowe" writes:
> Hello
>
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 09:59:11 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 01.07.2018 um 09:55 schrieb James Lowe:
>> > I don't know what the difference is between pull and fetch in
>> > terms of 'rights' but I'd have thought it would be the same right?
>> >
>>
>> Yes,
Hello
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 09:59:11 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.07.2018 um 09:55 schrieb James Lowe:
> > I don't know what the difference is between pull and fetch in terms of
> > 'rights' but I'd have thought it would be the same right?
> >
>
> Yes, the difference comes only on your o
Am 01.07.2018 um 09:55 schrieb James Lowe:
I don't know what the difference is between pull and fetch in terms of 'rights'
but I'd have thought it would be the same right?
Yes, the difference comes only on your own computer.
___
lilypond-devel m
Hello,
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 07:43:29 +0100, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Paul Morris writes:
>
> > On 06/28/2018 03:35 AM, pkx166h wrote:
> >
> >> * *Patch*: countdown --> push
> >> * *Comment*:
> >>
> >> Patch counted down - please push
> >>
> >
> > I tried pushing my patch to staging and got t
Paul Morris writes:
> On 06/28/2018 03:35 AM, pkx166h wrote:
>
>> * *Patch*: countdown --> push
>> * *Comment*:
>>
>> Patch counted down - please push
>>
>
> I tried pushing my patch to staging and got the following error:
>
> $ git push origin HEAD:staging
> fatal: remote error: access denie
5355]
<https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5355/> Doc: document
grob metadata in SVG output in Notation Reference*
*Status:* Started
*Created:* Thu Jun 21, 2018 06:35 PM UTC by Paul Morris
*Last Updated:* Mon Jun 25, 2018 09:41 AM UTC
*Owner:* Paul Morris
Doc: document grob metada
/notation/input.itely:2780: @node SVG Output
I think you will need to add this 'node' to the @menu section after
line #2665.
Thanks James. I took another look and since I'm adding an
@unnumberedsubsubsec underneath the '@subsection Alternative output
formats' I needed t
https://codereview.appspot.com/357720044/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/357720044/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2780
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2780: @node SVG Output
I think
LGTM!
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review, thanks, -Paul
Description:
Doc: document grob metadata in SVG output in Notation Reference
I.e. using the 'output-attributes' grob property to add id, class,
and other attributes to the SVG output for a given grob.
Please review thi
One thing I think we need is an entry in the changes.tely for this new
feature.
Also now that you have tracker access (and because I cannot reassign
this Rietveld issue to someone), could you Etienne create a new Rietveld
issue for the tracker (which is now assigned to you) when you make the
edit
Add '-dcrop' option to ps and svg backends
This change allows the output of scores in the format provided by the
'-dpreview' option but including all systems, not just the first.
This would allow for easier SVG use in HTML, without the need for
cropping snippets. Further, SVG is an HTML standard
In PS2, an implementation of the '-dcrop' argument was added to the 'ps'
backend. My implementation has also been revamped to *work* and be more
elegant. Letting James upload the patchset.
https://codereview.appspot.com/326960043/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely
File Documentation/usage/
Hit send too soon...
With the fix, there's still the run-time error:
/home/ubuntu/lilypond/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/backend-library.scm:245:18:
In procedure ly:paper-book-systems in expression (ly:paper-book-systems
book):
/home/ubuntu/lilypond/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/bac
Now that solves half of the issue. The other half is with the width, as my
patch would (should) also adjust the width to fit the music, leaving no
whitespace on any side.
This feature is basically only available when using \includes "
lilypond-book-preamble.ly" of which only works with the eps bac
On 07/27/2017 03:21 AM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a first attempt to merge the
dump-page and dump-preview methods
so that there is an option for
cropping pages that are not just
previews.
I wonder... is the desired functionality already provided by
one-page-breaking and/or one-line-aut
Oh, now I read the first message and see that the code doesn't work.
My first attempt at getting the code to work would be to change
"stensil" to "stencil" and see if that fixed things.
https://codereview.appspot.com/326960043/
___
lilypond-devel mai
I have listed some specific changes that must be made (move to the
proper alphabetical order) and raised questions about how the code
works with an apparently misspelled argument. I believe both of those
need to be fixed before pushing the patch.
I would also like to see crop apply to at least
I am going to leave this on review for this countdown only that the
submitter (not me) had doubts about this patch and was looking for any
guidance (it does pass all the tests BTW).
https://codereview.appspot.com/326960043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing l
N 0.0" section
from the output-preview-framework could be passed from output-framework
to
dump-page and there's a if statement for svg-begin for the -dcrop
option.
Guidance?
All the best
Étienne
Description:
Enhance the -dpreview method for SVG output
Issue 5165
Using SVG, the -
> On Oct 28, 2015, at 5:05 PM, David Sankel wrote:
>
> Would anyone object to a patch where I add a '-dpreview-include-all-systems'
> option to lilypond?
I for one am definitely interested in getting this feature into LilyPond, one
way or another. (I can’t speak to the best way to go about it
Am 28. Oktober 2015 22:14:21 MEZ, schrieb Simon Albrecht
:
>Hello David,
>
>On 28.10.2015 22:05, David Sankel wrote:
>> Would anyone object to a patch where I add a
>> '-dpreview-include-all-systems' option to lilypond?
>
>Generally I’d say that patches are welcome, but certainly it makes
>sense
Hello David,
On 28.10.2015 22:05, David Sankel wrote:
Would anyone object to a patch where I add a
'-dpreview-include-all-systems' option to lilypond?
Generally I’d say that patches are welcome, but certainly it makes sense
to find out if the feature is desired before putting too much work in
Answering my own question here...
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:14 PM, David Sankel wrote:
> I'm happy to work on a patch that dumps a "preview" of all systems, but
> I'm a bit stuck as to how. I'm looking at 'framework-svg.scm' here:
>
> (define (output-preview-framework basename book scopes fields
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il giorno sab 17 ott 2015 alle 20:05, David Sankel ha
> scritto:
>
>>
>>>> The problem I'm running into is that the SVG output option produces a
>>>> SVG
>>>> file with a length and
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il giorno gio 15 ott 2015 alle 22:10, David Sankel ha
> scritto:
>
>> I'm writing a Lilypond plugin for Sphinx and I'd like to use the SVG
>> output
>> to embed the lilypond output into html files. C
Am 16.10.2015 um 08:40 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> yes, try:
>
> lilypond -dpreview -dbackend=svg test.ly
>
But doesn't this output the first system only?
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lily
Il giorno gio 15 ott 2015 alle 22:10, David Sankel
ha scritto:
I'm writing a Lilypond plugin for Sphinx and I'd like to use the SVG
output
to embed the lilypond output into html files. Compared to PNG
embedding,
SVG will allow a single webpage to look crisp on many different
d
Hello all,
I'm writing a Lilypond plugin for Sphinx and I'd like to use the SVG output
to embed the lilypond output into html files. Compared to PNG embedding,
SVG will allow a single webpage to look crisp on many different devices and
minimizes the bandwidth necessary on clients.
T
>> Hosada-san
>>
>> On 13/09/15 23:00, Masamichi HOSODA wrote:
>>>>> In my experiment, by LilyPond 2.19.22 (before changing fonts to TeX Gyre),
>>>>> SVG output is not embeded text fonts.
>>>>> So I think that SVG backend does not e
> Hosada-san
>
> On 13/09/15 23:00, Masamichi HOSODA wrote:
>>>> In my experiment, by LilyPond 2.19.22 (before changing fonts to TeX Gyre),
>>>> SVG output is not embeded text fonts.
>>>> So I think that SVG backend does not embed any text fonts
&g
TeXGyreSchola, IIRC.
- Abraham
On Monday, September 14, 2015, pkx-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n181113...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hosada-san
>
> On 13/09/15 23:00, Masamichi HOSODA wrote:
>
> >>> In my experiment, by LilyPond 2.19.22 (before changing fonts to
Hosada-san
On 13/09/15 23:00, Masamichi HOSODA wrote:
>>> In my experiment, by LilyPond 2.19.22 (before changing fonts to TeX Gyre),
>>> SVG output is not embeded text fonts.
>>> So I think that SVG backend does not embed any text fonts
>>> independently of f
>> In my experiment, by LilyPond 2.19.22 (before changing fonts to TeX Gyre),
>> SVG output is not embeded text fonts.
>> So I think that SVG backend does not embed any text fonts
>> independently of font changing to TeX Gyre.
>>
>
> Did you use the down
Hosada-san,
On 13/09/15 14:48, Masamichi HOSODA wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Doing a simple
>>
>> lilypond -dbackend=svg test.ly
>>
>> My SVG output appears to not be embedding the fonts.
>>
>> From the Application Usage Guide it states:
>>
&g
> Hello,
>
> Doing a simple
>
> lilypond -dbackend=svg test.ly
>
> My SVG output appears to not be embedding the fonts.
>
> From the Application Usage Guide it states:
>
> "... This creates a single SVG file, without embedded fonts, for every
> page of
Hello,
Doing a simple
lilypond -dbackend=svg test.ly
My SVG output appears to not be embedding the fonts.
From the Application Usage Guide it states:
"... This creates a single SVG file, without embedded fonts, for every
page of output. It is recommended to install the Century Schoo
On 2014-04-07 18:28, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr writes:
(In the SVG definition I read:
The supported length unit identifiers are: em, ex, px, pt, pc, cm,
mm, in, and percentages.
I guess relational units as em or even % could equal staff spaces in
this case...)
LilyPond's pt is 1/72
Peter Bjuhr writes:
> (In the SVG definition I read:
>
>> The supported length unit identifiers are: em, ex, px, pt, pc, cm,
>> mm, in, and percentages.
>
> I guess relational units as em or even % could equal staff spaces in
> this case...)
LilyPond's pt is 1/72.27in while PostScript's (and lik
er to see what can be
done I've today done some testing of how offsets in the code affects the
SVG output.
When you set an offset like this:
\override TextScript.extra-offset = #'(0.3 . 0.3)
The unit of the change is as I understand it staff spaces. From using
different staff sizes I&#x
mentation/usage/running.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/20001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode409
Documentation/usage/running.itely:409: SVG output should be compatible
with any SVG editor or user agent. There
On 2014/02/14 10:24:08, Devon Schudy wrote:
Most users
mentation/usage/running.itely
File Documentation/usage/running.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/20001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode409
Documentation/usage/running.itely:409: SVG output should be compatible
with any SVG editor or user agent. There
On 2014/02/14
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/20001/Documentation/usage/running.itely
File Documentation/usage/running.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/20001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode409
Documentation/usage/running.itely:409: SVG output should be
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, thanks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
x27; and 'PS' references when talking about the file itself
(or a viewer) rather than say a file extension or (obviously) when using
it in a command line.
James
Description:
Doc: Point-and-Click has wrong default value and ref to SVG output needs
adding
Issue 3854
Also made sure t
lemzw...@googlemail.com schrieb:
>
>https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely
>File Documentation/usage/external.itely (right):
>
>https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely#newcode32
>Documentation/usage/external.itel
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely
File Documentation/usage/external.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely#newcode32
Documentation/usage/external.itely:32: in the @code{PDF} viewer. This
ma
Just FYI (since i was wondering myself): this morphed into
https://codereview.appspot.com/8974043 and was eventually pushed as
9621fd600e1153146ebd4326f40eef4491396a97
https://codereview.appspot.com/8273045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-dev
SoundsFromSound writes:
> Welcome. If you are interested in an online music application, have you
> looked here yet? -->
> http://weblily.net/web/guest;jsessionid=CF320C2C6F66038EA5B98FAC59F34B28
Or here
http://lilypond.org/schikkers
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond
music and web-development,
> I am interested in making an online
> music editing system that would maybe be half as good as Sibelius!
>
> The idea would be to use the lilypond with SVG backend.
> I have had a look at the SVG output from lilypond and
> I am impressed with the
Being interested in writing music and web-development,
I am interested in making an online
music editing system that would maybe be half as good as Sibelius!
The idea would be to use the lilypond with SVG backend.
I have had a look at the SVG output from lilypond and
I am impressed with the
On 2013/04/29 15:57:10, Graham Percival wrote:
Cool, that looks much better than my previous patch. Thanks!
Unfortunately, although firefox and inkscape handle the resulting svg
file quite
well, it isn't a valid file. According to the w3c validator
http://validator.w3.org/check
svg 1.1
Cool, that looks much better than my previous patch. Thanks!
Unfortunately, although firefox and inkscape handle the resulting svg
file quite well, it isn't a valid file. According to the w3c validator
http://validator.w3.org/check
svg 1.1 cannot contain a without an xlink attribute. Now, w
On 2013/04/06 09:25:57, dak wrote:
I actually can't see immediately from the code how one would arrive at
the
grob-cause expression. Can (*func), apparently a void function (?) be
made to
return it by default?
No clue; this involves a dark part of lilypond.
void
interpret_stencil_expressi
https://codereview.appspot.com/8273045/diff/2001/scm/output-svg.scm
File scm/output-svg.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8273045/diff/2001/scm/output-svg.scm#newcode545
scm/output-svg.scm:545: (if close-link
This code is too horrible to contemplate. Setting a global variable in
this
s
But there are some turnarounds.
> I'm rather sceptical about SVG output only that we do get occasionally
> gripes about LilyPond SVG output and Inkscape (for example), implying
> that our SVG backend (or whatever it is) is not 100% perfect, at least
> PNGs are 'just'
SVG what about PDF readers?
I'm rather sceptical about SVG output only that we do get occasionally
gripes about LilyPond SVG output and Inkscape (for example), implying
that our SVG backend (or whatever it is) is not 100% perfect, at least
PNGs are 'just' images.
James
___
2012/10/23 David Kastrup :
> Texinfo does not support SVG as far as I know. And neither do typical
> info readers like Emacs if I remember correctly.
This page seems to confirm your statement:
http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/Image-Syntax.html#Image-Syntax
But then wh
Federico Bruni writes:
> 2012/10/23 Joram Berger :
>> Ok, I've overlooked that.
>> Btw: SVG output is really nice!
>
> I agree.
> Personally, I'd love to see it used in the documentation. I wonder if
> it's possible to build the documentation using
2012/10/23 Joram Berger :
> Ok, I've overlooked that.
> Btw: SVG output is really nice!
I agree.
Personally, I'd love to see it used in the documentation. I wonder if
it's possible to build the documentation using SVGs instead of PNGs..
The documentation would be lighter
tput in the
>> format svg.
>
> there's an old issue still open for this:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=967
Ok, I've overlooked that.
Btw: SVG output is really nice!
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypo
2012/10/23 Joram Berger :
> Even though things are perhaps a little bit different, I would suggest
> to include svg (or the whole backend-options) into formats, if possible.
> Because thats essentially what the user wants: get the output in the
> format svg.
there's an old issue still open for thi
Hi,
could the lilypond options to specify the output file format be unified?
Currently, depending on the format, there are different options:
--pdf or --formats=pdf (and ps and png)
-dbackend=svg (eps, scm, …)
Even though things are perhaps a little bit different, I would suggest
to include svg
Insofar as I don't fully follow this, LGTM. Have you tested by changing
an input file and confirming that the regtest checker picks it up?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5815043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
On 2012/03/13 21:43:45, Graham Percival wrote:
The only problem I can imagine is: what version of imagemagick is in
GUB, and
what version of imagematick is required to handle svgs properly?
hmm, the tests would compare svg files as plain text files for now.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5815
The only problem I can imagine is: what version of imagemagick is in
GUB, and what version of imagematick is required to handle svgs
properly?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5815043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.g
Reviewers: MikeSol, phileholmes_googlemail.com,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Add regtest directory for svg output (issue 2230).
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5815043/
Affected files:
M GNUmakefile.in
M input/regression/GNUmakefile
A input/regression/svg
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Felix Kugel wrote:
3) The PDF output has lots of metadata, is this documented somewhere?
I think this is done by ghostscript ?
I have experiemced that Evince gives lots of warning/error messages about
these metadata. Don't know if Evince is wrong or the PDF files.
But
I am about to write a little tool which uses lilypond SVG for note
display. It's amazing how accurate lilypond's SVG looks!
I want to include more structural information in the SVG (note name,
voice info, MIDI info, ...). Technically, i would surround the note
head graphics element with and then
Hello,
2011/8/18 Sandor Spruit
>
> Hello,
>
> I recently had an informal discussion with some collegues on the use of
> SVG, in general.
> They are in music research, I am a developer working on a completely
> unrelated topic -
> so please forgive me my ignorance w.r.t. music-related terminology
Op 19-08-11 10:19, Mike Solomon schreef:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Sandor Spruit wrote:
[snip]
- In what version, exactly, did Lilypond drop the use of groups (svg:g) in its
output?
LilyPond still uses groups. grep "OK, thanks. I stand corrected. Let me rephase my comment. When looking
a
On Aug 19, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Sandor Spruit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently had an informal discussion with some collegues on the use of SVG,
> in
> general. They are in music research, I am a developer working on a completely
> unrelated topic - so please forgive me my ignorance w.r.t. music-rel
Hello,
I recently had an informal discussion with some collegues on the use of SVG, in
general. They are in music research, I am a developer working on a completely
unrelated topic - so please forgive me my ignorance w.r.t. music-related
terminology.
We discussed the possibilities to use music sc
2008/3/21, Aaron Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not sure what is going wrong, but that output file doesn't look right in
> inkscape.
Have you tried the following trick:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=334
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-devel
I'm trying to make svgs for wikipedia, and I'm having trouble, and I can't seem
to figure it out after looking through the documentation. I'm using this input
file: http://bassgoon.public.iastate.edu/aflat.ly
(I'm on windows, and I drag the input file onto a shortcut) The shortcut is:
"C:\Program
to the lilypond-user list?:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-devel%40gnu.org/msg13442.html
> SVG output from lilypond 2.11.27 currently specifies font-size as a
> decimal float "font-size:2.19953140378937", this is broken in
> Firefox. Changing to "font-size:4px&qu
Hi
My interest is to display lilypond SVG output in a web browser with the
possibility of making annotations to the SVG via JavaScript.
Stuart Pullinger said he'd patched Lilypond to modify the SVG output.
SVG output from lilypond 2.11.27 currently specifies font-size as a
decimal
oblems with this approach:
The hacks break support for any other output other than SVG.
- Solution: I keep the hacked version in its own source tree and link
to it using the "--relocate" option.
The output could be made more informative by adding more/different data
to the svg output. F
2007/3/27, Stuart Pullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Does anyone know of some documentation regarding adding commands to lilypond?
From a quick look over the lilypond source it seems that I would need to add a
function to scm/output-svg.scm to call "entity" to create the XML
tag. I would also need
t for metadata tags in Lilypond's svg
> > output? An example:
>
> It's certainly possible, but not likely to happen in the near future.
> If you have any skill at programming scheme, I recommend looking at
> scm/output-svg.scm
> and trying to add it yourself. This w
Stuart Pullinger wrote:
Would it be possible to add support for metadata tags in Lilypond's svg
output? An example:
It's certainly possible, but not likely to happen in the near future.
If you have any skill at programming scheme, I recommend looking at
scm/output-svg.scm
and try
interactivity in
the display which would be more difficult to achieve with ps/pdf.
Would it be possible to add support for metadata tags in Lilypond's svg
output? An example:
% lilypond file
{
c' \svgmetadata {mynamespace notestarttime 0.1234
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Heikki Junes wrote:
Firefox 1.5 was just recently released. The new version supports SVG
output.
In the SVG rendering of Firefox 1.5:
A) grobs were in right places
B) fonts are initially scaled and overlapping in the output
C) fonts (Emmentaler etc.) were missing
D
Heikki Junes wrote:
Firefox 1.5 was just recently released. The new version supports SVG
output.
In the SVG rendering of Firefox 1.5:
A) grobs were in right places
B) fonts are initially scaled and overlapping in the output
C) fonts (Emmentaler etc.) were missing
D) the output seemed to be too
Heikki Junes wrote:
Firefox 1.5 was just recently released. The new version supports SVG
output.
In the SVG rendering of Firefox 1.5:
A) grobs were in right places
B) fonts are initially scaled and overlapping in the output
C) fonts (Emmentaler etc.) were missing
D) the output seemed to be too
Firefox 1.5 was just recently released. The new version supports SVG output.
In the SVG rendering of Firefox 1.5:
A) grobs were in right places
B) fonts are initially scaled and overlapping in the output
C) fonts (Emmentaler etc.) were missing
D) the output seemed to be too small (width=&quo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > you may look into the private-fonts file to see if it makes any sense.
> Thank you, mftrace is working and I'll make you know if I have problems.
> Perhaps you consider it too preliminary, but should I be able to get it
> working, I could write a "tutorial" somewh
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 17:49, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> This is all very preliminary. The font format is .pfa
> (ie. feta20.pfa) they can be located anywhere, as long as
> private-fonts points to the right place. Just do:
>
>make -C mf pfa
>mkdir ~/.sodipodi
>ln -s $(pwd)/mf/out/priv
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
