> > > * How to handle dichotomy with TeX fonts and OTFs?
> >
> > What exactly do you mean?
>
> If we use OT for fonts, then we have to translate back to the right
> type1 fonts for --format=tex. I'm not sure how we should handle
> that.
Well, we plan to use glyph names, don't we? The only thin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I had a look at using Pango for typesetting text. See the attached
> > program.
>
> Which version of pango do I need for that? With 1.2.5 I get a
> segfault with G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME... Anyway, after commenting out the
> printf statement I was able to proceed.
You
> I had a look at using Pango for typesetting text. See the attached
> program.
Which version of pango do I need for that? With 1.2.5 I get a
segfault with G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME... Anyway, after commenting out the
printf statement I was able to proceed.
> I am wondering: are the number codes (pri
Hi Werner
(not sure whether this should be moved to lilypond-hackers, but here
goes.. )
I had a look at using Pango for typesetting text. See the attached
program. I am wondering: are the number codes (printed as c XXX)
really unicode codes? When I convert
\'all
as utf-8, I get
