On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:01, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
> The fix for me was to modify scm_debug_opts in libguile/eval.c,
> multiplying the stack size by about 10.
Thanks, that solved this particular problem.
--
Erik
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:01 +0200, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:01, Joe Neeman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 14:32 +0200, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > > On Monday 18 September 2006 16:09, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > > Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > > > > I tried some days ago
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 12:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> No, not a regression - since it doesn't affect output. Please apply.
Is this 'Please apply' as in 'Please apply after successfully making web', or
as in 'Please apply anyways'?
--
Erik
__
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:01, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 14:32 +0200, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > On Monday 18 September 2006 16:09, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > > > I tried some days ago. A problem is that I still couldn't make web
> > > > completely,
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 14:32 +0200, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Monday 18 September 2006 16:09, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > > I tried some days ago. A problem is that I still couldn't make web
> > > completely, even without the patch.
> >
> > That's strange. Did you try under
On Monday 18 September 2006 16:09, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > I tried some days ago. A problem is that I still couldn't make web
> > completely, even without the patch.
>
> That's strange. Did you try under GUB or a plain compile? (ie. guile
> 1.8 or 1.6.7)
plain compile,
On Monday 18 September 2006 16:34, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> >
> > I tried some days ago. A problem is that I still couldn't make web
> > completely, even without the patch.
> >
> > I also have an updated patch for my translator patch, which is as
> > well-tested. Both patche
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 12:46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch cleans up music functions:
- functions can have any arity, and parameters can be mixed in any way.
- implementation: A music function generates a sequence of tokens, so
e
Erik Sandberg wrote:
I tried some days ago. A problem is that I still couldn't make web completely,
even without the patch.
That's strange. Did you try under GUB or a plain compile? (ie. guile
1.8 or 1.6.7)
I also have an updated patch for my translator patch, which is as well-tested.
Bot
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 12:46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch cleans up music functions:
- functions can have any arity, and parameters can be mixed in any way.
- implementation: A music function generates a sequence of tokens, so
e
On Monday 18 September 2006 12:46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch cleans up music functions:
> > - functions can have any arity, and parameters can be mixed in any way.
> > - implementation: A music function generates a sequence of tokens, so
> > e
On Monday 18 September 2006 12:46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch cleans up music functions:
> > - functions can have any arity, and parameters can be mixed in any way.
> > - implementation: A music function generates a sequence of tokens, so
> > e
Erik Sandberg wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch cleans up music functions:
- functions can have any arity, and parameters can be mixed in any way.
- implementation: A music function generates a sequence of tokens, so e.g. a
(markup? music? scm?) function generates tokens MUSIC_FUNCTION EXPECT_SCM
Hi,
The attached patch cleans up music functions:
- functions can have any arity, and parameters can be mixed in any way.
- implementation: A music function generates a sequence of tokens, so e.g. a
(markup? music? scm?) function generates tokens MUSIC_FUNCTION EXPECT_SCM
EXPECT_MUSIC EXPECT_MAR
14 matches
Mail list logo