In message <20090116123513.ga2...@nagi>, Graham Percival
writes
It has to be noted that this sort
of "instrument physics" application is actually useful even if one
renders to normal scores rather than tabulature. It would also be nice
to get fingering indications from a reasonably programmable
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 04:24:36PM +0800, Graham Breed wrote:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> It could be argued that some sort of Prolog-like system of specifying
>> limitations might be more natural. Or a TeX-like system of specifying
>> penalties for certain transiti
David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
That's not a terrible idea -- IIRC Sibelius and Finale already
have something like that built-in -- but it doesn't belong in the
main lilypond code. I'd recommend writing a separate tool, using
python or something like htat.
It could be ar
> The other one is the attached lilypond file, which looks good if you
> just run lilypond on it, but if you run lilypond-book on the
> attached .lytex file, you don't really get a usable piece. I
> reported this issue a few months ago, and someone did do some work,
> so that the music no longer
> "Werner" == Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I'd especially like someone to look at some of the problems with
>> lilypond-book. Particularly the margin settings.
Werner> What exactly do you mean?
One of the problems I was thinking about does seem to have been fixed
on 2.12.
The
On Friday 16 January 2009 13:11:12 Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 16. Januar 2009 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > > On Friday 16 January 2009 02:46:22 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > > - the mentor is also expected to work almost full ti
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Obviously, one wants something like that when converting tunes to
>> tabulature. In the course of that, one might also want to be able to
>> insert algorithms for thinning out stuff: removing unplayable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 16. Januar 2009 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Shouldn't we start collecting possible project ideas (not only for SoC,
> > but for any possible newcomer to LilyPond, so that we don'
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > > - just mentioning their wishes, as others have done, is likely to be a
> > > waste of
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Shouldn't we start collecting possible project ideas (not only for SoC,
> but for any possible newcomer to LilyPond, so that we don't have to
> point them to the bug tracker telling him/her to simply choose a bug and
> work on that, which ca
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > - just mentioning their wishes, as others have done, is likely to be a
> > waste of time, not to mention an annoyance to the others, as _there
> > have to be compete
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> A rewrite of an intricate module intertwined with the bowels of lilypond
> is not something I consider realistic in this setting. You need someone
> with good code knowledge to achieve that, and not just for mentoring.
> If the code
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > That said, SoC doesn't recognize the importance of documentation,
>
> Not true. For example, Drupal had a SoC project that was
> documentation-only, and I imagine ot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 16. Januar 2009 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > On Friday 16 January 2009 02:46:22 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > - the mentor is also expected to work almost full time at least in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 16. Januar 2009 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Graham Percival writes:
> > A full list of possible projects is on the google issue list;
> > there's something like 300 open issues. Now, everybody has their
> > pet projects, but IMO a SoC should
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 02:46:22 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > - the mentor is also expected to work almost full time at least in the
> > beginning,
>
> Sorry, but from my experience with mentoring KDE projects, this is not
> really true
Graham Percival writes:
> A full list of possible projects is on the google issue list;
> there's something like 300 open issues. Now, everybody has their
> pet projects, but IMO a SoC shouldn't be directed at
> instrument-specific tasks like accordian or gregorian notation.
I beg to differ. S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 16 January 2009 02:46:22 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> - the mentor is also expected to work almost full time at least in the
> beginning,
Sorry, but from my experience with mentoring KDE projects, this is not
really true. It mostly depend
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 08:18 +0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:19:48PM +0100, Anne Ghisla wrote:
> > Johannes Schindelin ha scritto:
> >>
> >>> (unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
> >>
> >> But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
>
> Depends o
On 1/15/09 5:18 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:19:48PM +0100, Anne Ghisla wrote:
>> Johannes Schindelin ha scritto:
>
> That said, SoC doesn't recognize the importance of documentation,
> organization, and other vital things. So I say that Carl would be
> an ideal
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> That said, SoC doesn't recognize the importance of documentation,
Not true. For example, Drupal had a SoC project that was
documentation-only, and I imagine other projects had as well.
> A full list of possible projects is on the google issue
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:19:48PM +0100, Anne Ghisla wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin ha scritto:
>>
>>> (unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
>>
>> But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
Depends on what it is. I'm an excellent mentor for documentation,
and I'd really l
> I'd especially like someone to look at some of the problems with
> lilypond-book. Particularly the margin settings.
What exactly do you mean?
> I would think the reason those problems haven't been fixed is that
> it's more than a few hours to do it, but I would really be surprised
> if it wer
Laura Conrad writes:
> I'd especially like someone to look at some of the problems with
> lilypond-book. Particularly the margin settings. I would think the
> reason those problems haven't been fixed is that it's more than a few
> hours to do it, but I would really be surprised if it were more
Johannes Schindelin ha scritto:
(unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
Why? Are there no other mentor candidates except Han-Wen? I can say that
I'm quite independent :) and the students are allowed to consult the
develope
I'd especially like someone to look at some of the problems with
lilypond-book. Particularly the margin settings. I would think the
reason those problems haven't been fixed is that it's more than a few
hours to do it, but I would really be surprised if it were more than
two months.
--
Laura
I don't know if this is a pie in the sky, but the gregorian notation system
could use a caring hand, especially the spacing stuff.
Eyolf
On 15.01.2009 (13:45), Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the
> music streams infrastructure.
>
> (unfort
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the
> music streams infrastructure.
That would be nice.
> (unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
Ciao,
Dscho
P
Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the
music streams infrastructure.
(unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Anne Ghisla wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Sch
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Anne Ghisla wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > > > On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
> > > > > I think we can be under t
Anne Ghisla wrote:
Hello all,
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
I think we can be under the umbrella of FSF/GNU.
Can the mentor be a FSF/GNU mentor, or does there need t
Hello all,
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we can be under the umbrella of FSF/GNU.
> >
> > Can the mentor be a FSF/GNU mentor, or does there need
Carl Sorensen writes:
> Anne Ghisla gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I started working with LilyPond some time ago and I am impressed of
>> its high quality output and richness of features. I was wondering if
>> I could propose a project for Google Summer of Code [1], since I have
>> participated last y
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> > wrote:
> >>> I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1].
> >>
> >> Is somebody actually doing the work of applying for GSoC? AFA
On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>>> I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1].
>>
>> Is somebody actually doing the work of applying for GSoC? AFAIK you have
>> to be accepted as an organization, and you have
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>> I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1].
>
> Is somebody actually doing the work of applying for GSoC? AFAIK you have
> to be accepted as an organization, and you have to apply for that.
I think we can be under the umbrella of
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Joe Neeman wrote:
> I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1].
Is somebody actually doing the work of applying for GSoC? AFAIK you have
to be accepted as an organization, and you have to apply for that.
Ciao,
Dscho
_
Anne Ghisla gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I started working with LilyPond some time ago and I am impressed of its high
> quality output and richness of features.
> I was wondering if I could propose a project for Google Summer of Code [1],
> since I have participated last year and it
Hi Anne,
I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1]. As a Frog, you will get
some get some help in exploring lilypond's internals for the first time.
You could also have a look at the bug tracker [2] if you want ideas for
a project. Have a look, in particular, at the bugs with priority "Low"
o
Hello all,
I started working with LilyPond some time ago and I am impressed of its high
quality output and richness of features.
I was wondering if I could propose a project for Google Summer of Code [1],
since I have participated last year and it has been a positive experience,
and is still gr
40 matches
Mail list logo
