Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread John Mandereau
Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Yes, I could try to generate the packages and upload them to a given > place.  However, I've never done a lilypond release before, so any > guidance would be helpful. I hope the guidance from our Contributors' Guide is as good for this as it has been for me to get back to L

Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I got no reply from my last comment on #59, so I went for closing > it. I merged all others from #53 to #62. I'm not as certain for #61 > and #62 as for others, but I observed no regression with them and > nobody else commented. Thanks! > There are also old open pull requests left, do you ha

Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Please could you confirm which ones can happily be applied - is it > all from #53 (fontconfig: Avoid access...) to #62 (Enable ... on > macOS) or a subset? John already took action, and Knut will certainly comment soon :-) Werner ___ lilypond-

Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread John Mandereau
Werner LEMBERG wrote: > we had some good progress with GUB.  However, in the last few weeks > the development stalled, which is not good.  I thus propose the > following. > > * The pull requests as described in > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-01/msg0022 > 1.html >

Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Werner LEMBERG" To: ; Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 6:50 AM Subject: GUB progress? Folks, we had some good progress with GUB. However, in the last few weeks the development stalled, which is not good. I thus propose the following.

GUB progress?

2019-02-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, we had some good progress with GUB. However, in the last few weeks the development stalled, which is not good. I thus propose the following. * The pull requests as described in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-01/msg00221.html should finally be applied. I

Re: gub progress

2006-06-09 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg schreef: On Monday 05 June 2006 01:48, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Erik Sandberg schreef: I have GS_LIB= "/home/erik/lily/gub/gub/target/linux/system/usr/bin/../share/ghostscript /8.50/lib: /home/erik/lily/gub/gub/target/linux/system/usr/bin/../share/ghostscript/ 8.50/Resource" that'

Re: gub progress

2006-06-09 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 05 June 2006 01:48, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Erik Sandberg schreef: > > I have GS_LIB= > > "/home/erik/lily/gub/gub/target/linux/system/usr/bin/../share/ghostscript > >/8.50/lib: > > /home/erik/lily/gub/gub/target/linux/system/usr/bin/../share/ghostscript/ > >8.50/Resource" > > that's re

Re: gub progress

2006-06-05 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Pedro Kröger wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > although you are free to call me an idiot. > > no need to do that :-) ;-) > > - The repository format itself is fragile, just as cvs'. It is based on > > patches, so if there is one single pat

Re: gub progress

2006-06-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg schreef: Additional diagnostics: $ target/linux/system/usr/bin/gs GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps. $ find target/linux/system -name gs_init.ps target/linux/system/usr/share/ghostscript/8.50/lib/gs_init.ps I'm not sure if this is supposed to work; I a

Re: gub progress

2006-06-04 Thread Pedro Kröger
Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > although you are free to call me an idiot. no need to do that :-) > - It does not seem to focus on version control, but on changing the > order of patches. this is kind of true (I don't know enought about darcs to say it's totaly true) > - It

Re: gub progress

2006-06-04 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Pedro Kröger wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Also, if you want to ditch cvs, you always leave somebody behind. For > > example, from what I understand, Han-Wen likes darcs very much... and I > > know plenty people (me included) who don't l

Re: gub progress

2006-06-04 Thread Pedro Kröger
Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also, if you want to ditch cvs, you always leave somebody behind. For > example, from what I understand, Han-Wen likes darcs very much... and I > know plenty people (me included) who don't like it. Same goes for every > version control system, b

Re: gub progress

2006-06-03 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Saturday 03 June 2006 22:14, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > 2006/6/3, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Now gub builds correctly. However, when I invoke lilypond > > (target/linux/system/usr/bin/lilypond), it consistently fails when > > converting to pdf. > > > > Additional diagnostics: > > $ ta

Re: gub progress

2006-06-03 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Erik Sandberg wrote: > Also, what's the next step once lilypond-HEAD works nicely? I suppose the > first step is to make a local mirror of the lily cvs repository; in that > case, any suggestions for a good choice of version control system? I already proposed git, but y

Re: gub progress

2006-06-03 Thread Christian Hitz
Am 03.06.2006 um 18:51 schrieb Erik Sandberg: Additional diagnostics: $ target/linux/system/usr/bin/gs GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps. $ find target/linux/system -name gs_init.ps target/linux/system/usr/share/ghostscript/8.50/lib/gs_init.ps $ Ideas? To circum

gub progress

2006-06-03 Thread Erik Sandberg
Hi, Now gub builds correctly. However, when I invoke lilypond (target/linux/system/usr/bin/lilypond), it consistently fails when converting to pdf. Additional diagnostics: $ target/linux/system/usr/bin/gs GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps. $ find target/linux/syste