Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > although you are free to call me an idiot.
no need to do that :-) > - It does not seem to focus on version control, but on changing the > order of patches. this is kind of true (I don't know enought about darcs to say it's totaly true) > - It lacks a nice GUI where I can see what happened in a particular > branch. me too > In fact, I am not quite sure that you actually get the whole history, > what with all the patch reordering. this is true. the darcs documentation even mention it someplace. > - The repository format itself is fragile, just as cvs'. It is based on > patches, so if there is one single patch corrupt, you loose the history > from then on. hum, I haven't tought of that. > - git makes it _really_ easy to access older version without checking them > out. For example, I can get the differences in lily/music.cc between > version 1.3.108 and 2.9.7 with "git diff lilypond_1_3_108:lily/music.cc > lilypond_2_9_7:lily/music.cc". this is something that's a little bit annoing about darcs. Thanks for your email. I think I'll give git a try. Pedro _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
