Hi, On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Pedro Kröger wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > although you are free to call me an idiot. > > no need to do that :-) ;-) > > - The repository format itself is fragile, just as cvs'. It is based on > > patches, so if there is one single patch corrupt, you loose the history > > from then on. > > hum, I haven't tought of that. I actually had a fsck-up, because I accidentally issued a "rm -rf ." in one of my private projects. I was not really fast enough with Ctrl-C, but git could still access most of the revisions. > > - git makes it _really_ easy to access older version without checking them > > out. For example, I can get the differences in lily/music.cc between > > version 1.3.108 and 2.9.7 with "git diff lilypond_1_3_108:lily/music.cc > > lilypond_2_9_7:lily/music.cc". > > this is something that's a little bit annoing about darcs. > > Thanks for your email. I think I'll give git a try. Please do. And if you run into problems, do not hesitate to ask me, or the list. There are even some people on irc... Ciao, Dscho
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
