On 02.11.2008 (22:15), Till Rettig wrote:
> Trevor Daniels schrieb:
>> Eyolf
>>
>> More comments on Ancient now seem unlikely. T
> Oops, I totally forgot about it. I would like to review this, but I am
> not really fast at the moment. I might just start next week, or would it
> be better to wa
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Eyolf
More comments on Ancient now seem unlikely. T
Oops, I totally forgot about it. I would like to review this, but I am
not really fast at the moment. I might just start next week, or would it
be better to wait for the next version?
Greetings
Till
__
, "willing" would be more
accurate) to deal with any remaining formatting issues, although I'd be
delighted if you could do these too.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Eyolf Østrem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lily-devel"
Sent: Wednesday, October 0
On 02.10.2008 (00:04), Juergen Reuter wrote:
>
> Very nice, I like the structure and your explanatory add-ons!
Thanks
> Just a few nitpicking comments:
>
> * 2.8.3 (Typesetting mensural music): "There are no rests in Gregorian
> chant notation; instead, it uses Divisiones." I would have expecte
Very nice, I like the structure and your explanatory add-ons! Just a
few nitpicking comments:
* 2.8.3 (Typesetting mensural music): "There are no rests in Gregorian
chant notation; instead, it uses Divisiones." I would have expected this
statement to appear somewhere in 2.8.4 (Typesetting
Hi Eyolf,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The section on Ancient music is now ready for comments. It has been
> completely rewritten and reorganized, so please have a look at it and
> comment, correct, or criticize.
There are two examples in staff.itely t
The section on Ancient music is now ready for comments. It has been
completely rewritten and reorganized, so please have a look at it and
comment, correct, or criticize.
Here's a "changelog":
- The main change is that the general organization has been revised into
two main sections: Gregorian c
