Eyolf
More comments on Ancient now seem unlikely. There have not been many, but
that's par for the course when editing manuals :( Are you intending to
complete the transformation of Ancient sometime soon? If you could finish
off all the music-related stuff I'd be happy (well, "willing" would be more
accurate) to deal with any remaining formatting issues, although I'd be
delighted if you could do these too.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eyolf Østrem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lily-devel" <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:59 AM
Subject: NR 2.8 Ancient music ready for review
The section on Ancient music is now ready for comments. It has been
completely rewritten and reorganized, so please have a look at it and
comment, correct, or criticize.
Here's a "changelog":
- The main change is that the general organization has been revised into
two main sections: Gregorian chant notation and Mensural music. There was
fairly little overlap between the alternative signs, which were mostly
ancient, and the additional, which mostly belonged to the Gregorian
section.
- The two ligature tables in the Gregorian section have been merged into
one.
- There are still a few TODOs left, as well as missing cross references
here and there, the odd example of bad formatting, etc. This is
particularly true about the last section, which has not yet been written.
I focused on the main text for this first round; there will be another
round for this kind of formalities later on.
Eyolf
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
