Well,
I reordered what I consider erroneous behaviors in the GitLab issue page
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 7:55 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> Le 25 déc. 2022 à 19:44, Paolo Prete a écrit :
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 7:22 PM Jean Abou Samra
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > Le 25 déc. 2022 à 19:10,
Le 25 déc. 2022 à 19:44, Paolo Prete a
écrit :
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 7:22 PM Jean Abou Samra <[1]j...@abou-samra.fr>
wrote:
> Le 25 déc. 2022 à 19:10, Paolo Prete <[2]paolopr...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
>
>
> BTW:
>
> {
> \override T
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 7:22 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> > Le 25 déc. 2022 à 19:10, Paolo Prete a écrit :
> >
> >
> > BTW:
> >
> > {
> > \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##f
> > \tuplet 3/2 { s8 s8 s8 }
> > }
> >
> > In 2.24.0 and previous versions this raises the "omitting
> Le 25 déc. 2022 à 19:28, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>
> Am So., 25. Dez. 2022 um 18:18 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra
> :
>>
>>
>>
Le 25 déc. 2022 à 18:08, Paolo Prete a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello Jean,
>>>
>>> I just verified that 2.25 doesn't accept a tuplet of skips ( i.e: \tuple
Am So., 25. Dez. 2022 um 18:18 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
>
>
> > Le 25 déc. 2022 à 18:08, Paolo Prete a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Hello Jean,
> >
> > I just verified that 2.25 doesn't accept a tuplet of skips ( i.e: \tuplet
> > 3/2 { s s s }, while all the previous versions do.
> > Is this re
> Le 25 déc. 2022 à 19:10, Paolo Prete a écrit :
>
>
> BTW:
>
> {
> \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##f
> \tuplet 3/2 { s8 s8 s8 }
> }
>
> In 2.24.0 and previous versions this raises the "omitting tuplet bracket with
> neither left nor right bound" warning, even if the b
BTW:
{
\override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##f
\tuplet 3/2 { s8 s8 s8 }
}
In 2.24.0 and previous versions this raises the "omitting tuplet bracket
with neither left nor right bound" warning, even if the bracket-visibility
is explicitly set to false. It would be good, IMHO, that the w
Thanks, all clear.
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:44 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 25/12/2022 à 18:40, Paolo Prete a écrit :
>
Le 25/12/2022 à 18:40, Paolo Prete a écrit :
What error are you referring to, exactly? In case of my last snippet,
which produces a tuplet of three skips, it compiles fine with previous
versions.
For me,
\version "2.24.0"
\tuplet 3/2 { s s s }
gives (in 2.24.0)
Interpreting music...
warn
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:18 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> > Le 25 déc. 2022 à 18:08, Paolo Prete a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Hello Jean,
> >
> > I just verified that 2.25 doesn't accept a tuplet of skips ( i.e:
> \tuplet 3/2 { s s s }, while all the previous versions do.
> > Is this really inten
> Le 25 déc. 2022 à 18:08, Paolo Prete a écrit :
>
>
> Hello Jean,
>
> I just verified that 2.25 doesn't accept a tuplet of skips ( i.e: \tuplet
> 3/2 { s s s }, while all the previous versions do.
> Is this really intended?
No, as I wrote on a comment in the issue. It was not an inte
Hello Jean,
I just verified that 2.25 doesn't accept a tuplet of skips ( i.e: \tuplet
3/2 { s s s }, while all the previous versions do.
Is this really intended? I understand that a tuplet of skips doesn't
make sense in a score, but I believe it makes sense in a function.
I have some functions i
Le 25/12/2022 à 13:27, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 25/12/2022 à 13:02, Paolo Prete a écrit :
Hi Harm,
I deleted that character, but the error remains (it doesn't compile on
2.25.0 but it compiles on all the previous versions). I tested it on
Linux
(Ubuntu 22.04)
This is
https://gitlab.c
Le 25/12/2022 à 13:02, Paolo Prete a écrit :
Hi Harm,
I deleted that character, but the error remains (it doesn't compile on
2.25.0 but it compiles on all the previous versions). I tested it on Linux
(Ubuntu 22.04)
This is
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6482
Using \displayLily
Hi Harm,
I deleted that character, but the error remains (it doesn't compile on
2.25.0 but it compiles on all the previous versions). I tested it on Linux
(Ubuntu 22.04)
thanks
Paolo
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 12:32 PM Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> the culprit is a non-breakable space char
Hi Paolo,
the culprit is a non-breakable space character.
Delete it.
Am Sa., 24. Dez. 2022 um 20:20 Uhr schrieb Paolo Prete :
>
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed an inconsistent behavior with 2.25.0. The snippet below
> doesn't compile; I don't know if there is a hidden problem inside it, but
> it work
Hello,
I just noticed an inconsistent behavior with 2.25.0. The snippet below
doesn't compile; I don't know if there is a hidden problem inside it, but
it worked for all the versions prior to 2.25:
%---
test = #(define-music-functio
17 matches
Mail list logo
