Reviewers: Valentin Villenave,
Message:
\addInstrumentDefinition is deprecated; see commit
a7c014b60702e96bbc376892249b495bc10b8662. I've just removed the last
documentation remnants.
Description:
NR: Add many function index entries.
Also clean up some minor typos.
Also add
Hi Werner, that’s a very nice patch done in a quite methodical way. I
just have a question:
https://codereview.appspot.com/564590043/diff/546570043/Documentation/notation/staff.itely
File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/564590043/diff/546570043/Documen
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6766050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Folks,
not sure whether this has been already reported.
Looking at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/lilypond-index.html
I see around 600 completely useless entries containing `See also'.
This problem doesn't exist in the PDF version. In case this can't be
easily fixed
a tendency to
miss the fact that there are two entries and only follow the one, missing
important information.
>
> The @index and @funindex macros generate calls to
> different texinfo macros. From memory the @index
> macro calls @kindex and @funindex calls both
> @kindex and @findex.
d only follow the one, missing important information.
The @index and @funindex macros generate calls to
different texinfo macros. From memory the @index
macro calls @kindex and @funindex calls both
@kindex and @findex. The two types of index entries
are printed with different typefaces, so m
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: Duplicate index entries in NR
Phil, you wrote Saturday, November 19, 2011 11:44 AM
While looking for information in the NR I
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: Duplicate index entries in NR
Phil, you wrote Saturday, November 19, 2011 11:44 AM
While looking for information in the NR I
Phil, you wrote Saturday, November 19, 2011 11:44 AM
While looking for information in the NR I came across a duplicate
index entry. A bit of copy-and-paste and text manipulation and I
find that there are 65 - I've got the full list but a simple
example is acciaccatura. Is there any reason fo
While looking for information in the NR I came across a duplicate index
entry. A bit of copy-and-paste and text manipulation and I find that there
are 65 - I've got the full list but a simple example is acciaccatura. Is
there any reason for this?
--
Phil Holmes
___
2008/4/27 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mmm... Granted, it's surprising the first time you see it; however I
> kind of like it this way. Look at
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R5RS-Index.html
> it looks surprisingly familiar :)
I don't say that there is no nee
2008/4/26 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:27:55 +0200
> "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have not a word for it, actually. Is there a way to prevent
> > non-alphabetic initials to have their own section? It would be better
> > to group in a secti
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:27:55 +0200
"Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not a word for it, actually. Is there a way to prevent
> non-alphabetic initials to have their own section? It would be better
> to group in a section called "symbols" all these entries, then start
> with 'A' '
Look at the first page of the Appendix F (or E) of the printed NR manual.
I have not a word for it, actually. Is there a way to prevent
non-alphabetic initials to have their own section? It would be better
to group in a section called "symbols" all these entries, then start
with 'A' 'B'...
Yes, I
14 matches
Mail list logo
