On 4/18/09 9:26 PM, "Joe Neeman" wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:08 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/18/09 7:56 PM, "Joe Neeman" wrote:
>>
>>
>> If I do change to static typing, then I should have one routine that is
>> called from all three places, something like scm2dash_d
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:08 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> On 4/18/09 7:56 PM, "Joe Neeman" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 22:17 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >
> >>> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/62#newcode347
> >>> Line 347: SCM dash_details)
> >>> Since dash_det
On 4/18/09 7:56 PM, "Joe Neeman" wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 22:17 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/62#newcode347
>>> Line 347: SCM dash_details)
>>> Since dash_details seems to just be a list of Reals, perhaps its better
>>> to have a vect
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 22:17 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> On 4/17/09 1:47 PM, "joenee...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > Very pretty slurs!
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> >
> > http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/59
> > File lily/bezier.cc (right):
> >
> > http://codereview.appspot.com/41099
2009/4/18 Carl D. Sorensen :
>
>
>
> On 4/17/09 1:34 PM, "n.putt...@gmail.com" wrote:
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/52
>> File Documentation/user/expressive.itely (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/52#newcode634
>> Line 634: @lilypondfile[verbatim,lily
On 4/18/09 8:54 AM, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote:
>> Using a smaller design size might work with a squiggle-arpeggio, but
>> for composers who use the slur-arpeggio (I think Grieg was one?),
>> typesetting a thinner curve might be too subtle a difference.
>
> Ah, I haven't thought of the slur-arpeggi
> Using a smaller design size might work with a squiggle-arpeggio, but
> for composers who use the slur-arpeggio (I think Grieg was one?),
> typesetting a thinner curve might be too subtle a difference.
Ah, I haven't thought of the slur-arpeggio. Yes, I've meant the
squiggle-arpeggio.
Werne
On 4/17/09 10:20 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/17/09 1:47 PM, "joenee...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/59
>> File lily/bezier.cc (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/59#newcode275
>> Line 275: Bezier::subdivide
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > An example of a useful dashed bezier-sandwich arpeggio would be when
> > indicating arpeggios presumed to have been accidentally omitted from
> > a manuscript, within an urtext edition.
>
> I don't think so. The proper way would be rather to use an arpeggio
> typeset wi
> An example of a useful dashed bezier-sandwich arpeggio would be when
> indicating arpeggios presumed to have been accidentally omitted from
> a manuscript, within an urtext edition.
I don't think so. The proper way would be rather to use an arpeggio
typeset with a smaller design size. IMHO a
On 4/17/09 1:47 PM, "joenee...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Very pretty slurs!
Thanks!
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/59
> File lily/bezier.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/59#newcode275
> Line 275: Bezier::subdivide (Real t, Bezier &left_part, Bez
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 4/17/09 1:34 PM, "n.putt...@gmail.com" wrote:
> > http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/58
> > File lily/arpeggio.cc (right):
> >
> > http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/58#newcode168
> > Line 168: Stencil mol (Lookup::slur (curve, lt, lt, SCM_UNDEF
On 4/17/09 1:34 PM, "n.putt...@gmail.com" wrote:
Thanks for the review, Neil.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/52
> File Documentation/user/expressive.itely (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/52#newcode634
> Line 634: @lilypondfile[verbatim,lilyqu
Very pretty slurs!
http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/59
File lily/bezier.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/59#newcode275
Line 275: Bezier::subdivide (Real t, Bezier &left_part, Bezier
&right_part)
We only use references if they are const (for clarity), so ple
http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/52
File Documentation/user/expressive.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/41099/diff/1021/52#newcode634
Line 634: @lilypondfile[verbatim,lilyquote,texidoc,doctitle]
@ignore this unless you're going to run makelsr.py (or create input/lsr
file
15 matches
Mail list logo