http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_5.html
** Proposal summary
C++ will remain as-is, using astyle 2.02 (not astyle2.02.1) with
scripts/auxiliar/fixcc.py
Scheme will be indented with emacs --batch mode.
There should be no tabs in any C++ or scheme files.
** Motivation
It would be nice if we
Graham Percival writes:
> I'm sorry, but I am quite confused.
Ah, good.
> If I understand this paragraph correctly, then there has been a
> large communication problem. I am not proposing that we document
> manual procedures. Instead, I am proposing that we use automatic
> formatting for schem
I'm sorry, but I am quite confused.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:02:19AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Anything that can be automated, that otherwise would require manual
> intervention or attention, should be automated.
I definitely agree with this.
> I do not care if the tool is 50MB to ins
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> We do not use tabs for indentation in source code. Because this is an
> additional requirement that would mess-up the indentation of most other
> GNU projects, we will add a .dir-locals.el file holding
>
> ((nil . ((indent-tabs-mod
Graham Percival writes:
> ** Proposal summary
I would like to see it something like this, and have something like
this added to the documentation/archive:
All code is indented and formatted to the GNU coding standards, See
*(Standards)Formatting: .
This means that Emacs' indent-region leaves i
Two developers didn't seem fond of this idea, but other people
liked it, so it's not changed significantly.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_5.html
** Proposal summary
C++ will remain as-is, using astyle 2.02 (not astyle2.02.1) with
scripts/auxiliar/fixcc.py
Scheme will be indented with a ye
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:32:04AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:01 AM
>
> > Scheme will be indented with a yet-to-be written
> > scripts/auxiliar/fix-scheme.sh, which does the same thing as
> > emacs.
>
> This will certainly be useful to ensure
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:28:35PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
> > Keith OHara writes:
> >
> >> But beware that this uses mixed tabs and spaces, unless you have
> >> configured emacs to use spaces only, as most people prefer today,
> >
> > Should we put up directory-
David Kastrup writes:
> Keith OHara writes:
>
>> But beware that this uses mixed tabs and spaces, unless you have
>> configured emacs to use spaces only, as most people prefer today,
>
> Should we put up directory-local variables to promote this and a few
> other conventions?
Please do!
Jan
--
Keith OHara writes:
> But beware that this uses mixed tabs and spaces, unless you have
> configured emacs to use spaces only, as most people prefer today,
Should we put up directory-local variables to promote this and a few
other conventions?
File: emacs.info, Node: Directory Variables, P
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:21:06PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> > Do we explain that we're a GNU project and as
> > such use GNU coding style? Together with a pointer to the info
> > node *(standards)Formatting, that could help.
>
> Given that
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:01 AM
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_5.html
>
> ** Proposal summary
>
> Speaking academically, scheme code style is a “solved problem”.
> Let’s pick one of the existing solutions, and let a computer deal
> with this. Humans should not was
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 01:08:42PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Do you want to tell me (and them) that we shouldn't be editing
>> > .scm files in lilypond?
>>
>> This is not satisfactorily solved by first writing everything and
>> run
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 01:08:42PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> The stumbling block is _writing_ the Scheme code, not submitting it.
>> When is the last time a code review complained about Scheme code
>> formatting?
>
> I gave URLs in the proposal, but here you go:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 01:08:42PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Do you want to tell me (and them) that we shouldn't be editing
> > .scm files in lilypond?
>
> This is not satisfactorily solved by first writing everything and
> running an indenter afterwards. You'l
Graham Percival writes:
> I do not have emacs installed. I *WILL NOT* have Emacs installed.
> Carl has gone on record as saying that he will not use Emacs.
> IIRC Reinhold has also gone on record. We could conduct a poll if
> you want to see other people who do not, and *WILL NOT*, install
> em
Am 09.08.2012 11:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_5.html
** Proposal summary
Speaking academically, scheme code style is a “solved problem”.
Let’s pick one of the existing solutions, and let a computer deal
with this. Humans should not waste their time, energy, a
Hi Jan,
I'm don't mean to be snarky here but please look at the comments below.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
On 09/08/12 11:21, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> ** Motivation
>>
>> New contributors sometimes struggle to follow our indentation and
>> code style
>
> Yes, that's bad.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:21:06PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > New contributors sometimes struggle to follow our indentation and
> > code style
>
> Yes, that's bad. Do we explain that we're a GNU project and as
> such use GNU coding style? Together with a poi
Graham Percival writes:
> ** Motivation
>
> New contributors sometimes struggle to follow our indentation and
> code style
Yes, that's bad. Do we explain that we're a GNU project and as
such use GNU coding style? Together with a pointer to the info
node *(standards)Formatting, that could help.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_5.html
** Proposal summary
Speaking academically, scheme code style is a “solved problem”.
Let’s pick one of the existing solutions, and let a computer deal
with this. Humans should not waste their time, energy, and
creativity manually adding tabs or spaces to
21 matches
Mail list logo
