Graham Percival writes:
> I'm sorry, but I am quite confused.
Ah, good.
> If I understand this paragraph correctly, then there has been a
> large communication problem. I am not proposing that we document
> manual procedures. Instead, I am proposing that we use automatic
> formatting for scheme files.
Okay, good.
> I see two candidates for such automation:
>
> 1. the fix-scheme.sh script that Carl was writing. This
> introduces no additional dependencies.
>
> 2. a new fix-scheme-with-emacs.sh script which calls emacs to
> format a text file, i.e. something like
> If there is tentative agreement with this, then I will re-examine
> the proposal carefully to see where the misunderstandings arose
> and fix them; then I will re-submit the proposal.
Yes, I very much agree. Using something like the first two paragraphs
of my first, confusing email
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-08/msg00366.html
in the documentation and proposal would be great. Also, the Emacs
dir-local trick is already being taken care of, so it seems.
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
