Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources (accepted)

2011-08-12 Thread Ian Hulin
Hi Graham, I checked the html and typo alert... On 12/08/11 08:04, Graham Percival wrote: > No comments last time, but this is just a "confirmation of status > quo" proposal so I'm not concerned that I've missed any dissent. > Officially accepted now. > > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_7.ht

GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources (accepted)

2011-08-12 Thread Graham Percival
No comments last time, but this is just a "confirmation of status quo" proposal so I'm not concerned that I've missed any dissent. Officially accepted now. http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_7.html ** Proposal summary We shall treat developers (and contributors) as Independent volunteers: each

GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources (probable decision)

2011-08-03 Thread Graham Percival
nothing to see here, move along... http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_7.html ** Proposal summary We shall treat developers (and contributors) as Independent volunteers: each person does whatever they want, whenever they want. We have busy careers and lives; we make no expectations of action fro

Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

2011-07-30 Thread Jan Warchoł
l@gnu.org > )Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources > ) > > --snip-- > > )...with the aim to put > )as many issues in the tracker behind, under the lead of a suitable > )volunteer. > ) > )-- > > It might be more productive to assign a 'grou

RE: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

2011-07-30 Thread James Lowe
Hello, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of David Kastrup )Sent: 30 July 2011 17:34 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

2011-07-30 Thread David Kastrup
Jan Warchoł writes: > 2011/7/29 Graham Percival : > >> All I know is that it can't be me for the remainder of 2011.  In >> the first place I'd be an iffy choice due to my relative >> inexperience with lilypond programming, but the main reason is >> that I'm needed to run GOP and GLISS. > > Then i

Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

2011-07-30 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/7/29 Graham Percival : > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:56:38AM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: >> What will happen if we sign up to a team and not do our >> "homework"? > > Same idea?  Team leader has a chat with you, and in extreme cases > would just stop assigning you work to do.  I don't think this

Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

2011-07-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:56:38AM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: > 2011/7/28 Graham Percival > > However, if you do sign up > > for a concert, then you are normally only allowed to miss one > > rehearsal. > > And what happens if they miss more? In orchestra? The section leader would have a quiet ch

Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

2011-07-29 Thread David Kastrup
Jan Warchoł writes: > 2011/7/28 Graham Percival >> ** Amateur orchestra >> >> I shall describe the workings of the (Vancouver) “West >> Coast Symphony Orchestra” (at least when I was playing with them, >> back in 2002-2006). >> >>    There is no discouragement from missing a concert – members >>

Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

2011-07-29 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/7/28 Graham Percival > ** Amateur orchestra > > I shall describe the workings of the (Vancouver) “West > Coast Symphony Orchestra” (at least when I was playing with them, > back in 2002-2006). > >    There is no discouragement from missing a concert – members > know that they all have busy li

GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources

2011-07-28 Thread Graham Percival
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_7.html Recent discussions have prompted me to clarify this. ** Proposal summary How should treat+view developers? I see three main contenders: 1. Independent volunteers: each person does whatever they want, whenever they want. We have busy careers and liv