Hello, )-----Original Message----- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of David Kastrup )Sent: 30 July 2011 17:34 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources )
--snip-- )...with the aim to put )as many issues in the tracker behind, under the lead of a suitable )volunteer. ) )-- It might be more productive to assign a 'group of tracker items' with the aim to improve a specific area of identified problems, I think if a particular thorny problem was worked on 'en masse' or rather devs knew that it was being worked on 'en masse' we could perhaps get more done this way. >From a purely anecdotal/observation point of view the 'spacing stuff' was a >good case in point that has massively improved since 2.12 and it looked like >that was driven by one dev at first (Keith) and then when it got some traction >we really got a lot done, or it seemed so. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel