Hello,

)-----Original Message-----
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of David Kastrup
)Sent: 30 July 2011 17:34
)To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 7: Developers as resources
)

--snip--

)...with the aim to put
)as many issues in the tracker behind, under the lead of a suitable
)volunteer.
)
)--

It might be more productive to assign a 'group of tracker items' with the aim 
to improve a specific area of identified problems, I think if a particular 
thorny problem was worked on 'en masse' or rather devs knew that it was being 
worked on 'en masse' we could perhaps get more done this way.

>From a purely anecdotal/observation point of view the 'spacing stuff' was a 
>good case in point that has massively improved since 2.12 and it looked like 
>that was driven by one dev at first (Keith) and then when it got some traction 
>we really got a lot done, or it seemed so.

James


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to