2011/7/29 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:56:38AM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: >> What will happen if we sign up to a team and not do our >> "homework"? > > Same idea? Team leader has a chat with you, and in extreme cases > would just stop assigning you work to do. I don't think this is a > huge worry -- we're all reasonable people wanting to make lilypond > better.
Yes, i've just asked this question because it looked like being overlooked. >> > If we had a central authority leading a team (or teams) of >> > developers – or at least, leading developers for X hours a week – >> >> The question is, who will it be. > > *shrug* > > All I know is that it can't be me for the remainder of 2011. In > the first place I'd be an iffy choice due to my relative > inexperience with lilypond programming, but the main reason is > that I'm needed to run GOP and GLISS. Then i think it can't be you till 2013. I don't believe we'll sort GLISS out in less than a year ^^ I have lots, *lots* of issues myself. > We could have rotating leaders -- Carl for a month while they work > on fret stuff, Neil for two months while they work on fundamental > scheme stuff, Keith for a month while they work on spacing stuff, > Bertrand for a month while they work on ancient notation? That's fine, but i asked who the "central authority" would be. The one who will decide "we work for a month on frets under Carl's leadership, on Scheme under Neil's, and after that on this, and that." You know, the Grand Master. Hmm. Han-Wen? cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
