Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-25 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/6/22 Graham Percival > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:11:36PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > I think that the implied obligation is saying "Mike will help people who are > > playing with beam collision avoidance." > > Perhaps the word "expectation" would better express my worry. Ah, expectati

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:11:36PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > On 6/22/11 10:09 AM, "Jan Warchoł" > wrote: > > > I don't want to suggest laying implied obligations on anyone. > > Maybe there's a misunderstanding, so let's make things clear: do you > > say that asking Mike (who wrote automatic b

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-22 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 6/22/11 10:09 AM, "Jan Warchoł" wrote: > 2011/6/22 Graham Percival : >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: >>> Problem 1: a Frog tries to modify wind diagrams code and experiences >>> some difficulties.  (S)he sends an e-mail to -devel, but gets no >>> answers because

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-22 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/6/22 Graham Percival : > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: >> Problem 1: a Frog tries to modify wind diagrams code and experiences >> some difficulties.  (S)he sends an e-mail to -devel, but gets no >> answers because developer X (who wrote that code) overlooked his/

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-22 Thread Jan Warchoł
More ideas. Problem 1: a Frog tries to modify wind diagrams code and experiences some difficulties. (S)he sends an e-mail to -devel, but gets no answers because developer X (who wrote that code) overlooked his/her e-mail, and noone else knows the answer. Solution: a list of developers with "specia

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: > Problem 1: a Frog tries to modify wind diagrams code and experiences > some difficulties. (S)he sends an e-mail to -devel, but gets no > answers because developer X (who wrote that code) overlooked his/her > e-mail, and noone else know

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:53:09AM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: > 2011/6/18 Graham Percival : > > Maybe we'll just dump all newcomers on Janek? > > What's the status of this suggestion? I didn't notice any serious > discussion about it. There wasn't any. > (i mean, what are your opinions? I don't

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-21 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/6/18 Graham Percival : > Of people who have git access, what (if anything) > would make you consider being a mentor?  Not everybody > is cut out to be a teacher; if you don't feel comfortable in that > position, then it's best not to offer. I think the answer came to my mind: "i'd spend some

GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs - probably decision

2011-06-21 Thread Graham Percival
Not much change from the initial one. http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_2.html ** Proposal summary Many new contributors expect more help than they’re getting. We should either: 1. give them more help, or 2. tell them up-front that they won’t be getting help. Think of a roller-coaster e

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-21 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:01:37PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: > 2011/6/18 Graham Percival > > Here's the responsibilities for mentors.  Do any of these seem too > > heavy?  We can relax/remove any that are a sticking point for many > > people. > > I see that these are the same that we have in CG p

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-21 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:20:51PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote: > 2011/6/15 Graham Percival : > > I think the story of this patch > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1630 > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4490045/ > > is a horrible black eye for us.  Initial patch sent on 2011-04-29

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-21 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/6/18 James Lowe : > > Well I'm happy to help and of course I can 'mentor' someone around editing > doc and formatting and uploading patches, however I seem to be of the 'rare' > breed here that while understanding 'coding' principles and terminology, has > no ability to write code (I can ju

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-21 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/6/18 Graham Percival > Well, I'm not encouraged by the general disinterest in this topic. I'm afraid it's because this problem isn't about finding some new solutions or establishing a policy (like with C++ code formatting), but about doing more work. *Maybe* someone will discover a great ide

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-19 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 6/19/11 10:18 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > On 6/17/11 5:48 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> I'm not looking for somebody to say "I'll take one person" and >> then have me assign them somebody at random. Right now, I'm ju

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-19 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 6/17/11 5:48 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > I'm not looking for somebody to say "I'll take one person" and > then have me assign them somebody at random. Right now, I'm just > looking for a best-case theoretical scenario. Ma

RE: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-18 Thread James Lowe
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs > Maybe we'll just dump all newcomers on Janek? +1 ;) (only kidding!) > Let's look at specifics. Of people who have git access, what (if > anything) would make you consider being a mentor? Not everybody > is cut out to be a

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > This is especially tragic because the initial quality of the patch was very > high. Karin is clearly a gifted programmer who figured out how to solve > this problem on her own. Losing her potential contributions to LilyPond is > a r

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-15 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 6/15/11 5:44 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > > Perfect example: two weeks ago, issue 1630 chord autosplit was > almost finished (it only needed a few minor code formatting). But > then it stalled until I suggested to Janek that he should get in > touch with Karin 2 days ago. Then suddenly st

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:44:49PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:23:00AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > I'm not convinced we need a Frog Meister. Anyone capable > > of developing a patch to LilyPond code is capable of uploading > > it to Reitveld. Any help required

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-15 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/6/15 Graham Percival : > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:56:54AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> 2)  Many-a-university have open-source-upkeep CS (or music in >> centers like CCRMA) courses (i.e. "Case studies in advanced >> algorithmic auto-reglation of white space inconsistencies"). > > I

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:23:00AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:14 AM > Subject: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs > > > 1. Frog ("apprentice"): any newcomer is directed to the frog > >mailing list, and the Fr

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:56:54AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > 1) Geographical proximity helps big time. I know that, in a 30ish minute > face-to-face conversation with Bertrand Bordage, I was able to work through > what would otherwise take up to a week over e-mail. Absolutely! Fai

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-15 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:14 AM Subject: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs GOP 2 - mentors and Frogs Proposal summary Many new contributors expect more help than they’re getting. We should either: 1. give them more help, or 2. tell them up-front that they won’t be

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-15 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:14 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > Discussion begins. I expect a moderate amount of discussion and > changes to this proposal; it will not be as clear-cut as > GOP-PROP 1. > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_2.html > > > GOP 2 - mentors and Frogs > Proposal summary > > Man

GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-14 Thread Graham Percival
Discussion begins. I expect a moderate amount of discussion and changes to this proposal; it will not be as clear-cut as GOP-PROP 1. http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_2.html GOP 2 - mentors and Frogs Proposal summary Many new contributors expect more help than they’re getting. We should eithe