Proposal accepted now. I'll start implementing it soon.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
** Proposal summary
Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond
savannah are confusing and should removed, while other parts of
our source code aren’t in a repository at all!
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:50:56AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > * Reserve the savannah lilypond.git repository for logical
> > branches of master.
>
> I've moved ikebana to
> https://github.com/hanwen/ikebana
>
> I could a
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I've made a few clarifications to the original proposal, but
> nothing substantial is changed.
>
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
>
> ** Proposal summary
>
> Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond
> sava
2011/9/15 Janek Warchoł :
> 2011/9/15 Graham Percival :
>> ** Unchanged branches
>> (...)
>> stable/*
>
> I'm wondering if we can get rid of them, but i'm not sure about one
> thing: are they just a point in our history, i.e.
> ... (lots of commits) ...<2.x stable release commit>
> ... (lots of c
2011/9/15 Graham Percival :
> ** Unchanged branches
> (...)
> stable/*
I'm wondering if we can get rid of them, but i'm not sure about one
thing: are they just a point in our history, i.e.
... (lots of commits) ...<2.x stable release commit>
... (lots of commits) ... ?
Or are they true branches,
LGTM
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:33 PM
Subject: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories (probable decision)
I've made a few clarifications to the original proposal, but
nothing substantial is changed.
http
I've made a few clarifications to the original proposal, but
nothing substantial is changed.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
** Proposal summary
Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond
savannah are confusing and should removed, while other parts of
our source c
On 06/09/11 18:38, Graham Percival wrote:
> On that note, I wonder if it would be worth standardizing
> everything on LILYPOND_GIT instead of $HOME/lilypond-git. There
> would be no change to lilydev people, since we'd set that up for
> them, so it's just a matter of changing all the scripts+docs
Janek Warchoł wrote Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:22 PM
2011/9/6 Carl Sorensen :
But your last statement forces a particular location. What if on
my system
I have a conflict with that location? I shouldn't be forced to do
it.
Currently, I don't use lilypond-git. And I don't do an
out-of-t
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:17:44PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 19:20:05 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > What about just using environment variables, $LILYPOND_GIT and
> > $LILYPOND_MEDIA_GIT, then telling the user to set up these
> > variables by themselves? (po
2011/9/6 Carl Sorensen :
> But your last statement forces a particular location. What if on my system
> I have a conflict with that location? I shouldn't be forced to do it.
>
> Currently, I don't use lilypond-git. And I don't do an out-of-tree build
> (because it doesn't work for me on OS/X, an
On 9/6/11 11:25 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
>> Sent: 06 September 2011 18:20
>> To: Phil Holmes
>> Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
>> Subje
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 19:20:05 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:14:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > > The only kind of person who's interested in those other
> > > repositories will have their own favorite directory layout
> > > anyway (like me; all my source reposi
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 19:14:57 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
> > The only kind of person who's interested in those other
> > repositories will have their own favorite directory layout
> > anyway (like me; al
> -Original Message-
> From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
> Sent: 06 September 2011 18:38
> To: Phil Holmes
> Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 0
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
> >
> > What about just using environment variables, $LILYPOND_GIT
> > and $LILYPOND_MEDIA_GIT, then telling the user to set up
> > these varia
> -Original Message-
> From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
> Sent: 06 September 2011 18:20
> To: Phil Holmes
> Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 0
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:14:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > The only kind of person who's interested in those other
> > repositories will have their own favorite directory layout
> > anyway (like me; all my source repositories go under
> > $HOME/src/) so they'd ignore any recommendation any
> -Original Message-
> From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
> Sent: 06 September 2011 17:49
> To: Phil Holmes
> Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 0
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Another thought. We've established a standard (that not everyone adopts,
> but it's still a standard) that the git repository is locally stored in
> lilypond-git with the build being done in lilypond-git/build. Where would
> these new
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypond-devel-bounces+mail=philholmes@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+mail=philholmes@gnu.org]
> On Behalf Of Trevor Daniels
> Sent: 06 September 2011 10:27
> To: Graham Percival; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
> Sent: 06 September 2011 15:26
> To: Phil Holmes
> Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 0
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> How easy is it to switch between the various git repositories? Would we
> update lilygit, or reserve use of the new repositories for those who had
> started to use terminal?
It's not hard for command-line people. We would not upd
Am Tuesday, 6. September 2011, 15:45:25 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> How easy is it to switch between the various git repositories?
It's really simple:
git remote set-url origin [new-URL-comes-here]
Or if you want to keep the old, simply create a new remote:
git remote add newserver [new-URL-comes
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypond-devel-bounces+mail=philholmes@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+mail=philholmes@gnu.org]
> On Behalf Of Trevor Daniels
> Sent: 06 September 2011 10:27
> To: Graham Percival; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Subject:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:27:25AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Monday, September 05, 2011 9:39 PM
> >
> >http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
>
> I'm happy with this proposal, but the origin/dev branches
> are not mentioned explicitly. Presumably they remain
> u
Graham Percival wrote Monday, September 05, 2011 9:39 PM
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
I'm happy with this proposal, but the origin/dev branches
are not mentioned explicitly. Presumably they remain
unchanged?
Trevor
___
lilypond-
2011/9/5 Graham Percival :
> ** Proposal summary
>
> Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond
> savannah are confusing and should removed, while other parts of
> our source code aren’t in a repository at all!
generally LGTM, i only have one question:
> ** Proposal details
>
It's Tuesday somewhere in the world.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
** Proposal summary
Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond
savannah are confusing and should removed, while other parts of
our source code aren’t in a repository at all!
I propose:
* R
29 matches
Mail list logo
