On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:27:25AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote Monday, September 05, 2011 9:39 PM > > > >http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html > > I'm happy with this proposal, but the origin/dev branches > are not mentioned explicitly. Presumably they remain > unchanged?
Yes, since those are "logical" branches -- at some point in time the code in dev/* was "split away" from the code in master. By contrast, the branches I think we should move to a different repository were never "split away" from master. Unchanged are: master release/unstable lilypond/translation stable/* dev/* cvs/master tarball/master the last two aren't particularly relevant these days, but they don't do any harm. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
