> -----Original Message----- > From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca] > Sent: 06 September 2011 17:49 > To: Phil Holmes > Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org > Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > > Another thought. We've established a standard (that not everyone > > adopts, but it's still a standard) that the git repository > is locally > > stored in lilypond-git with the build being done in > > lilypond-git/build. Where would these new repositories be > locally stored? > > Wherever they want. We currently have an average of 3 commits per > *year* to those branches (and the things they would replace). > If they were easier to find, it might go up to 10 commits > per year, but I really doubt that it'd go higher. > > The only kind of person who's interested in those other > repositories will have their own favorite directory layout > anyway (like me; all my source repositories go under > $HOME/src/) so they'd ignore any recommendation anyway.
Wouldn't it be better to standardise them so that the doc and website builds can copy them using standard scripts? -- Phil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
