Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg wrote: is this a problem, given that the entire list is statical? Is there an advantage in only protecting the list's head? No, you're right, but it is a bit wasteful, and the check is much more naturally expressed with hash tables. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - htt

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-21 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 21 August 2006 11:37, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > In this particular case, the objects *were* statical (one object was > > allocated for each translator listener declaration). I saw that you > > softcoded & improved some parts of it, but I don't see the point (IIRC,

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-21 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 21 August 2006 11:39, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > There are still potential problems with system-specific differences in > > max cmdline lengths (but I don't know if it's a real problem). I've been > > thinking about one other solution as well: IIRC you have said it

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg wrote: There are still potential problems with system-specific differences in max cmdline lengths (but I don't know if it's a real problem). I've been thinking about one other solution as well: IIRC you have said it would be fairly easy to create a lilypond daemon, which could pr

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg wrote: In this particular case, the objects *were* statical (one object was allocated for each translator listener declaration). I saw that you softcoded & improved some parts of it, but I don't see the point (IIRC, the list is only used once on start-up, to detect typos). IIRC

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-21 Thread Graham Percival
Erik Sandberg wrote: I've been thinking about one other solution as well: IIRC you have said it would be fairly easy to create a lilypond daemon, which could process .ly files on demand with a short start-up time. If all .ly snippets of a make web are processed by a single instance of lilypond

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-21 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Saturday 19 August 2006 19:29, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > > Is this the scm_gc_protect in translator.cc (which you already fixed), or > > is it something unknown? > > It's unknown. The symptom is that -ddebug-

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-21 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Saturday 19 August 2006 19:31, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > BTW, it could also be because of differences in command-line lengths: My > > system is 64-bit, so snippets are named like lily-nn > > instead of lily-n; in addition, the max command-line len

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-19 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg wrote: BTW, it could also be because of differences in command-line lengths: My system is 64-bit, so snippets are named like lily-nn instead of lily-n; in addition, the max command-line length differs in ubuntu and macos IIRC. It seems that about 250 lily-

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-19 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg wrote: BTW, it could also be because of differences in command-line lengths: My system is 64-bit, so snippets are named like lily-nn instead of lily-n; in addition, the max command-line length differs in ubuntu and macos IIRC. It seems that about 250 lily-

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-19 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg wrote: On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Hi, Erik Sandberg wrote: Hi, I will be completely away from all kinds of computers whatsoever for about one more week. But stay tuned: some radical cleanups of music functions are in progress. did you realize that

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-15 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 14 August 2006 14:06, Erik Sandberg wrote: > On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > Hi, > > > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I will be completely away from all kinds of computers whatsoever for > > > about one more week. But stay tuned: some radical clean

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-14 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > Hi, > >> Erik Sandberg wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I will be completely away from all kinds of computers whatsoever for >> > about one more week. But stay tuned: some radical cleanups of music >>

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-14 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Hi, > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I will be completely away from all kinds of computers whatsoever for > > about one more week. But stay tuned: some radical cleanups of music > > functions are in progress. > > did you realize that

Re: Even more disconnected

2006-08-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg wrote: Hi, I will be completely away from all kinds of computers whatsoever for about one more week. But stay tuned: some radical cleanups of music functions are in progress. did you realize that your last radical cleanup left a memory leak that brought my autobuild to its kne

Even more disconnected

2006-08-07 Thread Erik Sandberg
Hi, I will be completely away from all kinds of computers whatsoever for about one more week. But stay tuned: some radical cleanups of music functions are in progress. -- Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.