On Monday 21 August 2006 11:37, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > In this particular case, the objects *were* statical (one object was > > allocated for each translator listener declaration). I saw that you > > softcoded & improved some parts of it, but I don't see the point (IIRC, > > the list is only used once on start-up, to detect typos). > > IIRC, the list was added to for each .ly file,
How did you conclude this? AFAICS, each element of the list is created by add_translator_listener (), which only is called from _internal_declare_xxx, which is a SCM_INIT_FUNC defined by the IMPLEMENT_TRANSLATOR_LISTENER macro. > and each cell of the list > was separately protected. is this a problem, given that the entire list is statical? Is there an advantage in only protecting the list's head? -- Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
