On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:14:50PM +, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Seriously though, the current situation for Lilypond is inconsistent. If
> you have a set of
> doing this. . .
> doing that. . .
> doing the other. . .
I agree with this. If LilyPond's successful output was more
terse
(lilypond "$*"&& echo Success) || echo Failed
1. Lilypond is a multi-OS application, it doesn't just run under bash
on a Linux-derived OS (e.g cmd on Windows, running from detached "gui"
environment from JEdit or Frescobaldi - btw JEdit could also be
running under Windows).
Doesn't LilyP
On 25/03/10 00:22, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
I've always thought it a real shame that the standard set of messages from
lilypond left you with a nagging sense of uncertainty whether it had
actually completed or not.
Typically, you would see this:
hello,
Mark Polesky wrote:
I have vague memories of being confused on Windows, not
using a command line (double-clicking my file icon). If I
recall, the only output I could find was the resulting log
file, and I often felt under-informed whenever the process
would hang.
Actually with windo
James Lowe wrote:
> So, from a non-Unix user who doesn't really 'know much
> stuff', I'd like to just add that I think it would be a
> nice step to know that the PDF was created, for example
> some earlier versions of Mac OS will not create the PDF if
> it is already open by another App, Windows li
Hello
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>
>> Why don't you alias lilypond to
>>
>> (lilypond "$*" && echo Success) || echo Failed
>>
>> simpler, and more conformant to the unix tradition ("no news is good
>> news").
>>
> We already print out a quite extensive log of informati
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
>>> I've always thought it a real shame that the standard set of messages
>>> from
>>> lilypond left you with a nagging sense of uncertainty whether it had
>>> actually completed or not.
>>>
>>> Typically, you would see this:
>>>
>>
>> Why do
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
I've always thought it a real shame that the standard set of messages from
lilypond left you with a nagging sense of uncertainty whether it had
actually completed or not.
Typically, you would see this:
Why do
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> I've always thought it a real shame that the standard set of messages from
> lilypond left you with a nagging sense of uncertainty whether it had
> actually completed or not.
>
> Typically, you would see this:
Why don't you alias lilypond to
I've always thought it a real shame that the standard set of messages
from lilypond left you with a nagging sense of uncertainty whether it
had actually completed or not.
Typically, you would see this:
$ Lilypond Exsultate.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.15
Processing `Exsultate.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreti
10 matches
Mail list logo
