On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ian Hulin <i...@hulin.org.uk> wrote:
> I've always thought it a real shame that the standard set of messages from
> lilypond left you with a nagging sense of uncertainty whether it had
> actually completed or not.
>
> Typically, you would see this:
Why don't you alias lilypond to
(lilypond "$*" && echo Success) || echo Failed
simpler, and more conformant to the unix tradition ("no news is good news").
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
