On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:14:50PM +0000, Ian Hulin wrote: > Seriously though, the current situation for Lilypond is inconsistent. If > you have a set of > doing this. . . > doing that. . . > doing the other. . .
I agree with this. If LilyPond's successful output was more terse, I'd agree with Han-Wen, but since we already spew out so many things on the command-line, it makes sense to add a "completed everything" or "5 pdf(s) created" or the same. That said, I'd also like a -q option to lilypond, which would only produce output for warnings or errors (i.e. no "calculating line breaks / pages / creating ps / etc). That way, everybody can get what they want: unix-style "no news is good news", and current-lilypond-style "keep the user informed". Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
