Andrew, you wrote Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:43 AM
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andrew Hawryluk wrote Monday, September 29, 2008 1:44 AM
I thought of this while writing the keyboards part but didn't say
anything because I didn't want to upse
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:10:43 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So Bowed strings should contain links to or examples
> of at least
>
> artificial harmonics,
Ref to NR 1.1.4
> bowing indications,
NR 1.3.1
> snap pizzicato,
NR B.6 -- I admit this one is a bit less obvio
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Hawryluk wrote Monday, September 29, 2008 1:44 AM
>>
>> I thought of this while writing the keyboards part but didn't say
>> anything because I didn't want to upset the established dichotomy of
>> fretted vs. unfr
2008/9/29 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Speaking of LSR, makelsr.py seems to be broken,
> it looks like it mangles backslashes in .texidoc files,
What a coincidence, I've just sent a note on this. (Subject: backslashes)
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
_
On 2008/09/29 08:28 +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I came to the same conclusion. It is also far easier
> to do this - no new files are needed, as the common
> notation for keyboards is pretty well right for the
> harp, and Harp slots in after Piano and Accordion.
>
> Perhaps we should change the
Andrew Hawryluk wrote Monday, September 29, 2008 1:44 AM
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Valentin Villenave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By the way, guitar/harp/piano/percussions are a same group in
orchestras, whereas strings are another group. Besides, harp notation
is (on a semantic/symboli
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Valentin Villenave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, guitar/harp/piano/percussions are a same group in
> orchestras, whereas strings are another group. Besides, harp notation
> is (on a semantic/symbolic level) much closer to keyboards or guitar
> stuff than
2008/9/28 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK, let's wait to hear from John and Valentin on this point.
Well, at first I was pleased with the fretted/unfretted distinction,
but you do have some good points.
As far as I can remember, when we created the unfretted section it was
mainly to add
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, September 28, 2008 11:48 AM
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:35:36 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just got round to looking at Unfretted strings in the Notation
Reference, and I'm not very happy with this subdivision.
1. It makes a nice contrast wit
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:35:36 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just got round to looking at Unfretted strings in the Notation
> Reference, and I'm not very happy with this subdivision.
1. It makes a nice contrast with "fretted strings".
2. There's almost no content in that s
I just got round to looking at Unfretted strings in the Notation
Reference, and I'm not very happy with this subdivision. At present
it includes bowed strings and plucked strings, which gives rise to
at least two problems. First, having two sub-divisions pushes the
real content down a level, wh
11 matches
Mail list logo
