On May 5, 2004, at 8:31 AM, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
Formal language reference sounds just good. It would show explicitly
that
LilyPond has a coherent syntax. The value of the language reference
would
increase a lot, if there would also be given the version indication:
(since 1.7.23)
That
On Tue, 04 May 2004 13:15:12 -0400 David Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 4, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
>
> >
> > Sounds like an interesting plan, but have a look at the existing
> > documentation first, I think there is already quite some reference
> > documentation avai
On May 4, 2004, at 2:00 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
This is a good initiative. If you really want formal, you could
consider writing the documentation as doc strings, at least for the
music expressions. See scm/define-music-types.scm for examples.
Aha, excellent! I will see what I can come up wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On May 4, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
>
> >
> > Sounds like an interesting plan, but have a look at the existing
> > documentation first, I think there is already quite some reference
> > documentation available. (from the website: follow the links to
> >
On May 4, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
Sounds like an interesting plan, but have a look at the existing
documentation first, I think there is already quite some reference
documentation available. (from the website: follow the links to
documentation, then program reference)
Well, yes,
