[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On May 4, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Stefaan Himpe wrote: > > > > > Sounds like an interesting plan, but have a look at the existing > > documentation first, I think there is already quite some reference > > documentation available. (from the website: follow the links to > > documentation, then program reference) > > Well, yes, there is already almost what I'm looking for there. The > program reference is too low level. The "notation manual" section of > the Lilypond manual is almost it. Basically, I'm looking for a more > formal notation manual. In fact, I can probably cut and paste a lot > out of it. But I'm looking for something more brief, more formal, and > alphabetical. Here's a quick and dirty example of what I'm thinking. > Let me know if such a thing already exists, or if you think this would > be of use or not.
This is a good initiative. If you really want formal, you could consider writing the documentation as doc strings, at least for the music expressions. See scm/define-music-types.scm for examples. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
