On Tue, 04 May 2004 13:15:12 -0400 David Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 4, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Stefaan Himpe wrote: > > > > > Sounds like an interesting plan, but have a look at the existing > > documentation first, I think there is already quite some reference > > documentation available. (from the website: follow the links to > > documentation, then program reference) > > Well, yes, there is already almost what I'm looking for there. The > program reference is too low level. The "notation manual" section of > the Lilypond manual is almost it. Basically, I'm looking for a more > formal notation manual. In fact, I can probably cut and paste a lot > out of it. But I'm looking for something more brief, more formal, and > alphabetical. Here's a quick and dirty example of what I'm thinking. > Let me know if such a thing already exists, or if you think this would > be of use or not. > > David Formal language reference sounds just good. It would show explicitly that LilyPond has a coherent syntax. The value of the language reference would increase a lot, if there would also be given the version indication: (since 1.7.23) -- Heikki Junes _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
