Keith OHara writes:
> David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>
>> You make it sound as if issue 2910 will warrant a bunch of fine-tuning
>> before the results can be called production-ready.
>
> No, the stencil-integral patch had changed the meaning of a padding,
> we started started fine-tuning the d
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> You make it sound as if issue 2910 will warrant a bunch of fine-tuning
> before the results can be called production-ready.
No, the stencil-integral patch had changed the meaning of a padding,
we started started fine-tuning the defaults in response, then the
pa
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Phil Holmes"
> To: ; "Keith OHara"
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: 2.17.26 regression tests
>
>> I'd seen the same long list of regressions be
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: ; "Keith OHara"
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: 2.17.26 regression tests
I'd seen the same long list of regressions before I uploaded the release,
and presumed it was down to slight padding ch
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 5:59 AM
Subject: 2.17.26 regression tests
I re-pushed the fix for issue 2910, which fixes the implementation of
outside-staff-padding, so many many regtests change slightly ... for the
third ti
"Keith OHara" writes:
> The test 'parenthesize.ly' now fails to meet its self-description, but
> that was due a change to the test input by David, so it seems to be
> one of his "not-yet-regression" tests that will pass after the patch
> for issue 1523 goes in.
Yes, sorry. I thought it would be
I re-pushed the fix for issue 2910, which fixes the implementation of
outside-staff-padding, so many many regtests change slightly ... for the third
time. Sorry about that.
(In hindsight, I should not have reverted the original 2910 fix. The first
report of a really bad MSWindows-only bug ha
