Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> writes: > David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes: > >> You make it sound as if issue 2910 will warrant a bunch of fine-tuning >> before the results can be called production-ready. > > No, the stencil-integral patch had changed the meaning of a padding, > we started started fine-tuning the defaults in response, then the > patch for 2910 restored the old meaning and backed out the fine-tuning, > so we are now closer to the last stable. > > The text over 'accidental-ancient.ly' went back to the layout it had > in 2.16. I made noise about places where I think things are too close, > and forced a silly example into the Changes entry, but people seem > satisfied with the output, so I am as well. > >> "Keith OHara" <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes: >> >> > We have a release with no known regressions. > > I did forget the \hspace thing from issue 3504. > > The other tracked items marked regression are some documentation items to > catch up, but those are in progress.
Sounds good. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
