"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> > To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>; "Keith OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 9:18 AM > Subject: Re: 2.17.26 regression tests > >> I'd seen the same long list of regressions before I uploaded the >> release, and presumed it was down to slight padding changes. I plan >> to run the pixel regression script today to see whether that has the >> same problem. > > > Done. 197 changed regtests, almost all down to minor text padding > changes. They all look OK to me.
What's the word from the big scorers regarding the need to reevaluate defaults? Kieren? Janek? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
