On 2009-08-26, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> It's better (see attached image) but not really good -- inkscape still
> >> produces better results.
> >
> > What was wrong with that image? Looks fine to me, and that's what
> > I see from my own conversion.
>
> Attached is the inkscape rendering. Note
>> It's better (see attached image) but not really good -- inkscape still
>> produces better results.
>
> What was wrong with that image? Looks fine to me, and that's what
> I see from my own conversion.
Attached is the inkscape rendering. Note how the green and blue box
are now synchronized co
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:25:45AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Werner, does the conversion from SVG->PNG work for you now? I'll add
> > a configure rule soon if this does solve the problem.
>
> It's better (see attached image) but not really good -- inkscape still
> produces better result
> It's better (see attached image) but not really good
BTW, I've tested with ImageMagick 6.5.5-2, with librsvg version
2.22.3.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> Werner, does the conversion from SVG->PNG work for you now? I'll add
> a configure rule soon if this does solve the problem.
It's better (see attached image) but not really good -- inkscape still
produces better results.
Werner
<>___
lilypond-d
On 2009-08-24, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:07:51PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > Can (b) be fixed at all? This is, does the SVG format support glyph
> > > access by name? Sinve SVG fonts themselves have glyph
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:07:51PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Can (b) be fixed at all? This is, does the SVG format support glyph
> > access by name? Sinve SVG fonts themselves have glyph names I suspect
> > it can be fixed...
>
> I
From: Patrick McCarty
Subject: Re: [git 17e68b85] make error in documentation
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:02:11 -0700
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>
>>> Additionally, it seems that some `convert' versions are buggy.
>>> Look, for example
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> It seems that (a) either `convert' or the file has some problems
>>> (but inkscape loads it without problems) and (b) that it has been
>>> forgotten to add a PNG version of this file.
>>
>> As for (b), I wanted to add png versions:
>> http:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> Additionally, it seems that some `convert' versions are buggy.
>> Look, for example, at the attached image, created with version
>> 6.4.3. For testing, I've manually issued the current Makefile rule
>>
>> convert -depth 8 \
>>
> Additionally, it seems that some `convert' versions are buggy.
> Look, for example, at the attached image, created with version
> 6.4.3. For testing, I've manually issued the current Makefile rule
>
> convert -depth 8 \
> -alpha Off \
> -background white \
> -la
>> Basically, I agree, but the case of SVG is quite problematic since it
>> relies on external fonts at certain locations. In particular,
>> `annotated-demo.svg'
>
> We don't use annotated-demo.svg.
Well, but due to the generic SVG->PNG rule in GNUmakefile it is
converted anyway, and this conver
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 06:08:35PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > As for (b), I wanted to add png versions:
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/msg00730.html
> > but I've been told off in the past for adding files that could be
> > added automatically.
>
> Basically, I a
>> It seems that (a) either `convert' or the file has some problems
>> (but inkscape loads it without problems) and (b) that it has been
>> forgotten to add a PNG version of this file.
>
> As for (b), I wanted to add png versions:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/msg00730.
On 2009-08-20, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:33:11AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On 2009-08-18, John Mandereau wrote:
> > > Le mardi 18 août 2009 à 03:55 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > > > If necessary we could use inkscape or rsvg, but I'd rather not
> > > > incre
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:33:11AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-08-18, John Mandereau wrote:
> > Le mardi 18 août 2009 à 03:55 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > > If necessary we could use inkscape or rsvg, but I'd rather not
> > > increase the build requirements. (IIRC inkscape isn'
On 2009-08-18, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le mardi 18 août 2009 à 03:55 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > If necessary we could use inkscape or rsvg, but I'd rather not
> > increase the build requirements. (IIRC inkscape isn't required
> > for master)
>
> Inkscape is required by input/regression/
Le mardi 18 août 2009 à 03:55 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> If necessary we could use inkscape or rsvg, but I'd rather not
> increase the build requirements. (IIRC inkscape isn't required
> for master)
Inkscape is required by input/regression/backend-svg.ly, which had been
disabled when some
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:57:26AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> It seems that (a) either `convert' or the file has some problems (but
> inkscape loads it without problems) and (b) that it has been forgotten
> to add a PNG version of this file.
As for (b), I wanted to add png versions:
http://
On 2009-08-18, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> [git 17e68b85]
>
> `make doc' fails with
>
> ...
> convert annotated-demo.svg out-www/annotated-demo.png
> convert: Must specify image size `/tmp/magick-XXqtAIPz'.
> convert: missing an image filename `out-www/annotated-demo.png'.
> make[3]: ***
[git 17e68b85]
`make doc' fails with
...
convert annotated-demo.svg out-www/annotated-demo.png
convert: Must specify image size `/tmp/magick-XXqtAIPz'.
convert: missing an image filename `out-www/annotated-demo.png'.
make[3]: *** [out-www/annotated-demo.png] Error 1
This is `convert'
21 matches
Mail list logo
