From: Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git 17e68b85] make error in documentation
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:02:11 -0700
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Werner LEMBERG<w...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Additionally, it seems that some `convert' versions are buggy.
>>> Look, for example, at the attached image, created with version
>>> 6.4.3. For testing, I've manually issued the current Makefile rule
>>>
>>> convert -depth 8 \
>>> -alpha Off \
>>> -background white \
>>> -layers flatten \
>>> -trim \
>>> text-input-1-annotate.svg \
>>> text-input-1-annotate.png
>>>
>>> (omitting the problematic `+repage' option as mentioned in another
>>> mail). As can be seen, the green and red rectangles no longer cover
>>> the letters exactly since there is missing indentation.
>>
>> I've just upgraded to convert 6.5.4: Now `+repage' is recognized, but
>> the result is even worse! No fonts have been changed; calling the
>> above creates the attached image, which uses horrible fonts, and the
>> offset is still wrong. Sigh.
>>
>> Anyone else who gets this?
>
> No, my output is fine (convert 6.5.4.8). It's possible that your
> imagemagick is not compiled with rsvg support. You can check this
> with
>
> $ convert identify -list format | grep SVG
Indeed, I get this list:
MSVG SVG rw+ ImageMagick's own SVG internal renderer
SVG SVG rw+ Scalable Vector Graphics (XML 2.7.3)
SVGZ SVG rw+ Compressed Scalable Vector Graphics (XML 2.7.3)
I'm using the openSuSE 11.2 package for ImageMagick. It seems I have
to complain to them that rsvg is not compiled in -- and I have to
compile ImageMagick by myself...
> But we can't rely on that.
Actually, we can. Just add some configure script code which checks
for rsvg.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
