>> It's better (see attached image) but not really good -- inkscape still >> produces better results. > > What was wrong with that image? Looks fine to me, and that's what > I see from my own conversion.
Attached is the inkscape rendering. Note how the green and blue box
are now synchronized correctly with the text.
> *sigh* we've spent way too much effort on this. Why don't we go
> back to the idea of just adding a png directly? The old web
> branch did this, and it's not like we're going to change the png
> often.
Basically, I don't oppose, but getting correct SVG->PNG conversion is
something which should be available in any case, not only for
lilypond, but in general.
Werner
<<inline: inkscape.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
