So, it would be a good thing to update the
Brew formula and get it back into Homebrew.
--
Sven Axelsson
++[>++>+++>++>++
><<<<<-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>.<++.>>>++.<<<<.>>.<.
le to use the deleted brew as a
starting point.
--
Sven Axelsson
++[>++>+++>++>++
><<<<<-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>.<++.>>>++.<<
ill be released
sometime in September, so we need a 64-bit build before then.
--
Sven Axelsson
++[>++>+++>++>++
><<<<<-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>.<+
ew due to the dependency on Guile 1.8 which
conflicted with too many other packages. But the prebuilt binaries from
lilypond.org *are* available through "brew cask" which
Getting 500-errors for all pages on the lilypond site. Anyone know what's
going on?
Sven Axe
} c8. c16 c4 c2 | }
> { \grace { s32 } c8. c16 c4 c2 | }
> }
> c8. c16 c4 c2 |
> }
>
Ah, yes. I remember having to do that in multipart music, but not i
ta 2 {
c8. c16 c4 c2 |
}
\alternative {
{ \grace c32 c8. c16 c4 c2 | }
{ c8. c16 c4 c2 | }
}
c8. c16 c4 c2 |
d idea of how this would
> have looked in MusiXTeX:
> [snip verbosity]
>
Ah yes, MusixTeX. Those were the days. I used to do my bagpipe music in
MusixTex and before that, in MusicTeX. I must say that I greatly prefer
Lilypond though. Because of the fiddly syntax, I used to def
Here's my (very simple) Vagrant setup. Am I perhaps missing some
dependencies?
https://gist.github.com/svenax/8222686
--
Sven Axe
On 2 January 2014 17:10, James wrote:
> On 02/01/14 15:51, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Sven Axelsson writes:
>>
>> It appears as if texi2html needs word-writeable folders to work.
>>>
>> No, it just needs writeable folders to work.
>>
>> Th
It appears as if texi2html needs word-writeable folders to work. Thus I
took the simple route of running make doc (and make test) under sudo. Is
that how others does it too?
--
Sven Axelsson
this is needed in more places.
--
Sven Axelsson
++[>++>+++>++>++
><<<<<-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>.<++.>>>++.<<<<.>&
ely.texilog.log for errors
And "suffix-tely.texilog.log" contains "*** out-www/ not writable". Not
sure which one of the many out-www folders that is referring to, but they
are all writable as far as I can see.
I am probably miss
On 1 January 2014 00:30, David Kastrup wrote:
> Sven Axelsson writes:
>
> > Fantastic work everyone with getting version 2.18 out of the door.
> >
> > When I saw the release notice, I immediately wanted to update the
> Homebrew
> > formula (Homebrew is a packa
compile with the default Guile which is currently 2.0.9.
I know that there have been plans of bumping to Guile 2 for a long time
now. Is this something that is planned for the next release? If not, that's
fine too, I'm just curious.
All the best
--
Sve
also have no idea how to fix this in the lilypond
> distribution so that such manual actions become unnecessary.
OK. Addin
t change anything. I also
tried copying the Lilypond Centyry font to the normal Mac font folder,
but that didn&#
do think the new
version looks better and is more readable than the old one. And as
long as it works correctly in the
On 3 January 2011 10:12, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 09:52:58AM +0100, Sven Axelsson wrote:
>> On 3 January 2011 00:39, wrote:
>> > LGTM, could you send me a patch to apply? (git format-patch origin)
>> >
>> > http://codereview.appspo
On 3 January 2011 00:39, wrote:
> LGTM, could you send me a patch to apply? (git format-patch origin)
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/3825043/
>
The patches are downloadabe from Rietveld.
--
S
On 2 January 2011 16:48, Sven Axelsson wrote:
> On 2 January 2011 16:27, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> override-auto-beam-setting doesn't work in 2.13. Please try your example in
>> 2.13.
>
> Yes, I just realised that myself. Sorry about that.
>
> I have updated http:
On 2 January 2011 20:22, Daniel Dadap wrote:
> Sven Axelsson wrote:
>> I am the author of the bagpipe.ly mode included in the Lilypond
>> distribution. I'm sorry I haven't been very visible here the last
>> several years. I haven't had much user feedback for
On 2 January 2011 16:27, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> override-auto-beam-setting doesn't work in 2.13. Please try your example in
> 2.13.
Yes, I just realised that myself. Sorry about that.
I have updated http://codereview.appspot.com/3825043/ accordingly.
--
Sv
On 2 January 2011 15:30, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 1/2/11 4:56 AM, "Sven Axelsson" wrote:
>
>> On 2 January 2011 12:23, Sven Axelsson wrote:
>>> On 2 January 2011 00:35, wrote:
>>>> looks mostly ok, but I don't know what&#x
On 2 January 2011 12:23, Sven Axelsson wrote:
> On 2 January 2011 00:35, wrote:
>> looks mostly ok, but I don't know what's up with those beaming rules.
>>
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/3825043/diff/1/ly/bagpipe.ly
>> File ly/bagpipe.ly (right):
est of the CG this seems to be ignored.
The simplest thing surely must be to make your changes in a separate
git b
t do what they should. I guess I'd
better look into how to make new beaming rules work right instead of
using
On 31 December 2010 23:53, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 05:35:43PM +0100, Sven Axelsson wrote:
>> Perhaps a starting point would be if someone could have a look at what
>> I'm doing in https://github.com/svenax/bagpipemusic/. The relevant
>> file is
.ly, and there are lots of examples on how to use
it in the repo as well.
The new mode is not backwards compatible with the old one, so I would
have to include some convert-ly rules if approved. Or perhaps it could
actually be included as bagpipe_new.ly, not replacing the old one
sn't been specifically forbidden and the line is stretched, use
+ ragged spacing. */
+ if (last && i == 0
+ && lin
r instance, the PPC support
will be discontinued, so we can't fall back on that as for 10.5.
I'm not trying to push anyone to do extra work or anything, and I would
check myself if I could, but I think it would be good to know this before
Snow Leopard is released in September
quot;libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3"
"scm_init_srfi_1"):
/opt/local/share/guile/1.8/srfi/srfi-1.scm:223:1: file:
"libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3", message:
"dlopen(libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so, 9): image not found
version of Lilypond up
and running one of these days.
--
Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
available. Anyone? Please, pretty please? Just the
command line stuff is fine, no need for any GUI crud.
--
Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 27/02/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/27/07, Sven Axelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At some point between 2.11.7 and 2.11 20 gracenote beaming started to
> take the note value into account. I want to revert to the old behaviour, how
> do I d
At some point between 2.11.7 and 2.11 20 gracenote beaming started to take
the note value into account. I want to revert to the old behaviour, how do I
do that? See the attached images for an example of what I mean.
--
Sven Axelsson
bad.png
Description: PNG image
good.png
Description: PNG
ixed, at least in the 2.9 documentation as far as I can
see. Or are there any particular places in the documentation where
code samples still use the wrong single quotes?
--
Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://
On 25/12/05, Sven Axelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/12/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sven Axelsson wrote:
> > > This hack for putting volta brackets at a fixed y-position doesn't
> > > work anymore. What is the
On 25/12/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sven Axelsson wrote:
> > This hack for putting volta brackets at a fixed y-position doesn't
> > work anymore. What is the current incantation?
> >
> > \override Staff.Volt
This hack for putting volta brackets at a fixed y-position doesn't
work anymore. What is the current incantation?
\override Staff.VoltaBracket #'Y-offset-callbacks = #(list
Staff_symbol_referencer::callback)
\override Staff.VoltaBracket #'staff-position = #10
-
On 15/10/05, Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sven Axelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 10/10/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sven Axelsson wrote:
> >> > Now I am trying to find the correct
. It is probably easier to request a solution from the texinfo people.
>
I'm sure it can be done reasonably simply though. As I posted some
months ago, it is easy enough to get TeX to output a "real" single
quote instead of a curly one. This is how to do that:
Quote Sven Axels
compilation-start. However when Emacs tries to load the elc file it failes with "byte-code: End of file during parsing". I guess this indicates that something more serious is wrong. So what would be a good approach to debugging this?
-- Sven Axelsson
__
gnatures and bars (what would be the point of his originalfunction otherwise?). But I'm speculating.Exactly.-- Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 10/10/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sven Axelsson wrote:> Now I am trying to find the correct properties to tweak to ge the> inserted score from the original code to take up zero vertical space,> but I haven't gotten it right yet. Any hints?
have a loo
7;s contents. But the effect is that it creates an empty page and then puts everything on top of each other at the next page. Is this a bug, or am I missing the point of Devnull?
Now I am trying to find the correct properties to tweak to ge the inserted score from the original code to take up zer
On 10/10/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sven Axelsson wrote:> I use manual volta brackets a lot for marking alternative bars in the> middle of a measure. It would be great if I could force those to have a> vertical bar at the end even when not adjacent to a repea
cheme to allow for arbitrary music? As of now I'm not allowed to use \score or \layout in such a block. If that was possible it would be much easier to write the \example function.
-- Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
ist, and I don't have a clue as to what that would be.
-- Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Output_def *layout = me->get_layout (); Real half_space = 0.5; @@ -128,5 +132,5 @@ ADD_INTERFACE (Volta_bracket_interface, "volta-bracket-interface",
"Volta bracket with number",- "bars thickness height");+ "bars thickness height vertical-end");-- Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Graydon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:55:15PM +0200, Sven Axelsson scripsit:
>> Graydon wrote:
> [snip]
>>> The grace note comes out closer to the second note than the first,
>>> but not as close to the second note as in the 'no beam' case.
>>>
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Sven Axelsson wrote:
>> Graydon wrote:
>>
>>> There's a fair bit of Highland Bagpipe music where a grace note
>>> occurs between two substantial notes which are not connected by a
>>> beam.
>>>
>>> F
es the position of the note head only:
extraSpace = \once \override Staff.NoteHead #'extra-offset = #'(-1 . 0)
Good luck. Nice to see that someone is using the bagpipe additions.
--
P/S Sven Axelsson, The Murray Pipes & Drums of Gothenburg
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
From: Graham Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 3-Aug-05, at 11:44 PM, Sven Axelsson wrote:
>
> Our Fearless Leader will object to this, probably using dire phrases
> like "polluting the global LilyPond namespace" and "creating future
> support nightma
We can then assume that anyone who includes
bagpipe.ly do want to write bagpipe music and that they are fine with
the "hidden" behaviour of also setting the key signature.
--
Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sven Axelsson wrote:
> > As far as I understand, the above should be
> > the same as putting
> >
> > \override Score.KeySignature #'print-function = ##f
> > \set Score.extraNatural = ##f
> >
nt-function = ##f
\set Score.extraNatural = ##f
\set Staff.keySignature = #'((0 . 2) (3 . 2))
in the score. But, no, it isn't. Anyone know why?
--
Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Score ... } }, but what about the rest?
Also, wouldn't
\remove "KeySignature_engraver" do the same thing?
Plus that the user could put it back with
\consists "KeySignature_engraver" if he wants.
--
Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
\trill in the ground and T or C in the
taorluath and crunluath,
> I have also been working on a parser for BMW type entry for
> light music.
Sounds interesting. I did my music using BagpipeTeX before, but
Bagpipe Music Writer is obviously very common, so a bmw2ly
pro
> From: Stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I agree. What about my idea of not removing the Key_engraver and
> Accicental_engraver, putting it in the key of D major, and
> supressing the
> key signature with the line:
>
> \override Score . KeySignature #'print-function = ##f
>
> And also c
> From: Stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On 29-Jul-05, at 12:15 AM, Sven Axelsson wrote:
> >
> I agree. What about my idea of not removing the Key_engraver and
> Accicental_engraver, putting it in the key of D major, and
> supressing the
> key signat
61 matches
Mail list logo
