On 31 December 2010 23:53, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 05:35:43PM +0100, Sven Axelsson wrote: >> Perhaps a starting point would be if someone could have a look at what >> I'm doing in https://github.com/svenax/bagpipemusic/. The relevant >> file is bagpipe_new.ly, and there are lots of examples on how to use >> it in the repo as well. >> >> The new mode is not backwards compatible with the old one, so I would >> have to include some convert-ly rules if approved. > > Are there any parts of your new file that can be added without > tweaking the score and layout? If so, why not prepare a patch for > those "un-controversial" parts, and get those accepted first? > > Are your layout tweaks any less severe than stuff we do for > gregorian? If so, that could be a good reason to accept them. If > not, you could just make a few macros which do the tweaks, so that > users only have to do > \include "bagpipe.ly" > \paper { > \bagpipeSpacing > }
Quite correct. Here's a patch that only introduces the improved gracenote spacing and adds a few more complex grace notes. That should be fairly uncontroversial I believe. http://codereview.appspot.com/3825043 -- Sven Axelsson ++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++>++++++ >++++<<<<<-]>++++.+.++++.>+++++.>+.<<-.>>+.>++++.<<. +++.>-.<<++.>>----.<++.>>>++++++.<<<<.>>++++.<----. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
