On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:55 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I see a shortcut for utf-8-strings in pango-font.cc. This is
>> all well and good except that it is hard to do box
>>
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:55 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I see a shortcut for utf-8-strings in pango-font.cc. This is
> all well and good except that it is hard to do box
> approximations on these guys (it'd require adding lots of code).
> How mad would LilyPond be if
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> To verify that a "patch" Issue has been fixed, we check the commit. Using
> the git web interface, is there a way to find the commit from the commitish?
> I've tried but can't find a way, but I'm assuming I'm missing something.
There is no wa
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> On Thu 18 Aug 2011 07:50:28 BST, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> The load-order issue appears to be fixed, testing with git and guile 1.8
> and 2.0.2. Ignoring whitespace changes, this patch LGTM.
>
> Some more shuffling is needed to make sure we ha
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> What's the plan+status of these?
>
> I'd like to have the first release candidate for 2.16 in 3-4
> months. If we think that we can sort out any problems with those
> dependencies... or any other build dependencies, for that
> matter... the
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> To whoever enjoys this stuff,
:-)
> 2) make release/unstable be exactly what we have in master.
I've just taken care of this.
Regards,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gn
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
> Proposal: let’s follow PEP-8.
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
>
> * use 4 spaces per indentation level
> * never max tabs and spaces
> * Code indented with a mixture of tabs and spaces should be
> converted to usin
Hi Mike,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:08 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
>
> I've been getting this from LilyPond recently:
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
> Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
This usually means that ther
Hi Bernardo,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2011-03-29, Bernardo Barros wrote:
>> I think we might need some little changes to compile lilypond with gcc 4.
>> I'm getting the following errors with latest git.
>>
>> http://pastebin.c
Hi,
In the future, please send messages like this to -devel. I don't
think everyone on -user wants to see these nasty linker errors...
On 2011-03-29, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> I think we might need some little changes to compile lilypond with gcc 4.
> I'm getting the following errors with latest
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Could I introduce you to the wonders of git-rebase ? In
> particular:
> git rebase -i master^^
> (however many ^ you need to cover all your recent work)
> This lets you clean up your git history before pushing to master,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On 18/02/11 02:13, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
>> LGTM.
>>
>> Can you email me your patch so I can apply it?
>
> Here's the patch.
I retested everything, and the patch checks out just fine. I've pushed it.
Thanks,
Patrick
___
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:08:29PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
>> I have a patch queue with
>> (potential) fixes for LilyPond so that we can support both Guile 1.8
>> and 2.0.
>
> Great! Comment 5
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
> I don't see a need to support both guile 1.8.x and guile 2.0.x at
> the same time -- as far as I'm concerned, we can drop any
> guile-1.x-isms as soon as 2.15 begins.
Uh, I'm not sure what you mean here. I have a patch queue with
(pote
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
>
> I tried to upload three patches to rietveld. I got the message:
>
> pls@pls:~/lilypond-git$ git pull -r
> Current branch master is up to date.
> pls@pls:~/lilypond-git$ git cl upload origin/master
> Cannot upload with a dirty tree. You m
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> Now - there's one other interesting feature here. If I delete the fourth
> line of the lyrics above (the one with the explicit font) and run Lily
> 2.13.49, saving the PS file, it has the following in the postscript header:
>
> %%DocumentMed
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
> We have two ways of making it not a Critical issue:
> 1) make the output the same. If that means fiddling with the
> release-2.14 branch of GUB, fine. If that means changing stuff in
> lilypond git, fine. If that means six weeks of mak
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'm checking some of the lyric-based issues in case they've been fixed in
> the latest release, and came back across
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1294
[snip]
> {
> \time 3/4
> \relative c' { c2 e4 g2 e4 }
> \addly
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Francisco Vila reported that postprocess-html.py also has references to CSS
> files. This patch corrects that file to use the new CSS filenames and get
> rid of the alternatives. It makes clean on my system. Could someone push
> it, please?
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 1/29/11 6:20 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:19:10PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>> I meant to post this to -devel a while ago, but I opened a Github
>>> tr
Hello,
I meant to post this to -devel a while ago, but I opened a Github
tracker issue for GUB.
Here's the link:
https://github.com/janneke/gub/issues#issue/2
Thanks,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
Hi Mike,
On 2010-12-22, Mike Solomon wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am embarking on a new project to make lily dance.
>
> Attached are 3 files:
>
> 1) svgdance.svg (best viewed in something that's not Internet
> Explorer - click on the notes and/or accidentals and see what
> happens!)
Very cool!
> 3
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 12/14/10 10:26 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>
>> There are currently 8 issues to verify that could and should have been
>> verified. I've asked the bug squad to check them, and I've been over them
>> myself and I don't have the skills to c
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
>>> Well - because it's unusual. Far more common to have a sharp on a
>>> natural note in the key sig, or a natural on a flat, for example.
>>
>> And a regtest should not test unusual thin
On 2010-12-12, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > The patch below seems to work. Is this the correct fix?
>
> Of course! Please push asap.
Okay, pushed.
Thanks,
Patrick
___
On 2010-12-11, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
> I can't run `make doc' due to a compile failure on git master (as of
> commit 75cdeeefba1e4762a29b5f418b8d6294a0eba18e).
>
> Valentin, do you have a fix for this?
The patch below seems to work. Is this the correct fix?
d
Hello,
I can't run `make doc' due to a compile failure on git master (as of
commit 75cdeeefba1e4762a29b5f418b8d6294a0eba18e).
The relevant snippet that fails is in fretted-strings.itely:
\version "2.13.42"
\include "predefined-ukulele-fretboards.ly"
myChords = \chordmode { a1 a:m a:aug }
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 04:19:59PM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:
>> I'll try the texlive-bin maintainer. Is this going to be a problem with
>> 2.13.42 do you think?
>
> I expect it would still be a problem. Or rather, if 2.13.42 works
> when 2
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Hello. I am translating the program gettext file. What's the point of
> emphasizing words with @var{} in msgid's? Is the output
> (warning/errors etc) of the program to be processed by texinfo?
I think the intent is to *eventually* generat
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I found these in paper-defaults-init.ly:
>
> #(define make-header (...))
> #(define make-footer (...))
> #(define font-defaults '((...)))
> #(define text-font-defaults `((...)))
>
> 1) Do we need the quasiquote ` for text-font-defaults?
>
On 2010-11-30, Francisco Vila wrote:
>
> commit 05acc0d1a25051a35083aeb2acf0955678e882cf
> Author: Reinhold Kainhofer
> Date: Wed Nov 24 16:50:23 2010 +0100
>
> FiguredBass: Extenders for figs of different width should stop at same
> posit
This is the latest commit on my local mast
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> I also think it would be useful to have two code freezes on
>> stable/2.14: one for code/docs, and one for translations (right before
>> the
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
> 2) release 2.14 ASAP with no critical flaws, but with some kind of
> code freeze.
> Many software projects implement a "freeze" before a release --
> when the project is "frozen", this means that no changes are
> allowed, unless they
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> ...I'd prefer a blank line before and after every @item
>> including the first one...
>
> +1
>
> But only because I'm too lazy to fix the paragraph
> formatting command in Vim (gqap), which turns this:
>
> @item
> lin
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:17 AM, David Santamauro
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:32:06 -0700 Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> The second state is in the form of scheme music expressions. The job
>> of the parser is to convert lilypond music expressions into scheme
>> music expressions. Most user-d
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
>
> Patch with amended title attached.
Thanks Ian. I've pushed your patch to git master.
Regards,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> All right, hopefully everyone here won't mind one last vote,
> so please state your preference among the following:
>
> SPACE MINIMUM-DISTANCE
> -- --
> 1) basic-distance minimum-distanc
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
> Bug squad: Phil is busy with the opening of a musical, so it would be
> nice if somebody else could check the regression test comparisons for
> both 2.13.37 and 2.13.38. It would be a shame if some horrible bug
> was introduced in the pa
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Christoph wrote:
>
> Is there a way to have point-click-behavoir or any semantic
> meta-information about the correspondending postion in
> the .ly-file in SVGs that a generated with the SVG-Backend (like in PDFs?).
Not currently, but it should be possible to add
Hi Ian,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
>
> I've just done some stuff with this file to ensure it compiles OK when
> running using Guile V1.9.
>
> It declares all it stuff in a module (define-module (scm dislplay-lily)
>
> It currently gets loaded by lily.scm as part of the dyna
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> We're about 10-20 hours of work away from having 0 Critical
> issues. On one hand, that sounds great; we're almost there! On
> the other hand, we've been in this state for the past month. I'm
> not seeing a lot of excitement and work tow
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> As near as I can tell, this code is triggering an infinite loop that fails
>> when the scheme heap overflows.
>
> Interesting.
>
>> arg is *not* a stream-event, it's a music-event
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Patch is attached.
Thanks, I've pushed it.
Regards,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, John Mandereau
wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 18/10/2010 alle 09.20 -0700, Patrick McCarty ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:17 AM, John Mandereau
>> wrote:
>> > I don't understand the issue; can't you just set PYTHON=python2 w
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:17 AM, John Mandereau
wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 18/10/2010 alle 09.02 -0700, Patrick McCarty ha scritto:
>> Yes, but unfortunately, LilyPond needs special sed treatment, since
>> many substitutions are made *after* configure time. I will need to
>&
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 05:38:20PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> --) Two scripts still have "/usr/bin/python" lines
>> (python/auxiliar/manuals_definitions.py, and scripts/build/pytt.py).
>> Those should
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> Huh. I've been following the Arch Linux development list
>> for a while, but it didn't occur to me that they were
>> doing something radically different than the recommended
>>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon, and I'm trying to
>> figure out what to do with regard to LilyPond's build system. I don'
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Patrick McCarty gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon,
>
> What does this mean? "$ python" will give Python 3?
Yes.
> If so, that's no good. "pyth
Hello,
Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon, and I'm trying to
figure out what to do with regard to LilyPond's build system. I don't
know if Arch Linux is the first distribution upgrading to Python 3,
but this migration will be happening any day now.
The distribution-wide policy is
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> With GCC 4.5.1, I'm seeing a compile failure with latest git.
>> Reverting your commit edd89894 fixes it. Here's the error:
>>
>> cont
Hi Graham,
With GCC 4.5.1, I'm seeing a compile failure with latest git.
Reverting your commit edd89894 fixes it. Here's the error:
context-def.cc: In static member function 'static scm_unused_struct*
Context_def::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)':
context-def.cc:118:1: error: expected 'while' be
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:27 AM, wrote:
>
> I just tested this change with Guile 1.9, and everything checked out,
> though I didn't test Guile 1.8. I did a build from scratch and
> eliminated the cache from ~/.cache/guile just to be sure.
>
> Can you verify?
>
> I'm testing with the commit at th
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:29 AM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Occasionally when i run 'git pull -r' in a terminal I get the following
>
>> jl...@jlowenetbuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git pull -r
>> usage: git merge-base [-a|--all] ...
>>
>> -a, --all outputs all common ancestors
>>
>> usage: g
On 2010-09-12, Mark Polesky wrote:
> So, I'm trying to start a fork at
> http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond/mpolesky.git, but I get:
>
> $ git push --dry-run
> ow...@repo.or.cz's password:
> [3 attempts here, then...]
> Permission denied (publickey,password).
> fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Kilian
wrote:
>
> a fellow openbsd developer noticed that the 2.12.3 source tarball
> (http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/sources/v2.12/lilypond-2.12.3.tar.gz)
> differs from the same version from late december (december, 20th,
> I think).
>
> P
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> I disagree most vehemently with your "fix" in
>> af68a98e6c142e3479498b49ae924919efa94c77
>
> Yes, it wasn&#
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I disagree most vehemently with your "fix" in
> af68a98e6c142e3479498b49ae924919efa94c77
Yes, it wasn't really a typo fix, but the word "experimented" doesn't
really make sense to me in this context. What would you sugges
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
>> under Vista on my system:
>>
>> Running lilypond-book
>> Traceback (most recent call
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
> under Vista on my system:
>
> Running lilypond-book
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "c:/program files/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book.py", line 86, in ?
> import book_base
On 2010-08-11, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 08:32:24AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > Is there any requirement to continue with the alternate
> > css files in the web? These were set up, IIRC, to enable
> > people to view and comment on alternative designs, but
> > we seem to
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> While looking into the @help in download.itexi (the font size used for
> smallexample) I
> noticed that the css file currently being used to
> build the web is css/lilypond-web.css. Is this
> correct? The css title is "Patrick McCarty's d
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 1 August 2010 21:49, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
>> I think I found the problem.
>>
>> With Guile 1.9, `module-public-interface' doesn't return an interface
>> for `the-scm-module', which we rely o
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:03 PM, wrote:
> On 2010/07/29 19:24:46, Neil Puttock wrote:
>>
>> + = scm_list_3 (ly_symbol2scm ("module-use!"), mod, used);
>>
>> This effectively exports all bindings, so all local defines are
>> now exported.
>>
>> In the case of `profile-property-access.ly', the format
On 2010-07-27, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:15:36AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Graham Percival
> > wrote:
> > > Why on earth do we have a
> > > filetype off
> > > set runtimepath
> > &
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Why on earth do we have a
> filetype off
> set runtimepath
> filetype on
>
> in the suggested .vimrc ? Those lines should be unnecessary.
I need those lines to work around behavior that (I think) changed in
very recent Vim versions.
Bas
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:43:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> IMO, that method is more reliable, and I don't have to worry about
>> modifying a ~/.vim/filetype.vim for LilyPond.
>
> Dudes! This is w
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:43:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>> IMO, that method is more reliable, and I don't have to worry about
>>>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:43:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> IMO, that method is more reliable, and I don't have to worry about
>> modifying a ~/.vim/filetype.vim for LilyPond.
>
> Dudes! This is w
Hi Colin,
On 2010-07-25, Colin Campbell wrote:
>
> As I understand it, the supported filetype.vim and vimrc are only
> found in the /vim directory of a source tree.
I wouldn't call either of files *supported*, since as far as I can
see, neither of them have ever been installed on a user's system
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I'm a bit suspicious about commit
> 4578dfbfdab5704ffc5317adfb252cb242f30115
>
> 1. AFAIK, we definitely want people creating or modifying
> ~/.vim/filetype.vim
> It's just possible that it might be on a different location on
> windows, bu
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> In compiling lilypond this morning, I saw this:
>>
>> font-metric.cc:82: warning: unused parameter 'k'
>>
>>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> Hey all,
> In compiling lilypond this morning, I saw this:
>
> font-metric.cc:82: warning: unused parameter 'k'
>
> Checking out the function in question, I saw this:
>
> Box
> Font_metric::get_indexed_char_dimensions (size_t k) const
> {
>
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/18/10 3:11 PM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
>>Op zondag 18-07-2010 om 13:35 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick
>> McCarty:
>>> I think if we "roll our own" LilyPad, and borrow a lot of id
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/18/10 2:56 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
>
>> It could be smart to work together with gummi,
>> possibly there are better programs than gummi,
>> possibly we're better off stealing their technology
>> (poppler pdf display) and rolling
Hi Jan,
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
>
> While I appreciate your working on lilypad, I doubt
> whether this is an efficient way of spending our efforts.
Yeah, I'm getting a little carried away. :)
I'm starting to think it would be difficult expanding on the curren
Hi,
Here is a patch for GUB that fixes an uninstallation issue for Windows
LilyPad:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1179
Thanks,
Patrick
>From 8cab842cd79ca0fcb9b1d26a361c19441feea057 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:01:44 -0
script
improvements from this wiki page:
http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Uninstall_only_installed_files
Let me know if there are any problems.
Thanks,
Patrick
From eadbbae85fa146c57e806b98a96653987c1635af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:44:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 6/16/10 1:58 AM, "flup2" wrote:
>>
>> I would like to know if somebody knows how conductng signs (
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=259
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=259 ) are created by Lilypond.
>>
>> In a lot of books (K
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> From a syntactical point of view, I can't see an immediate benefit of
>>> saying
>>>
>>> #path:miter
>>>
>>> instead of
>>>
>>> #'miter
>>
>> Hm? Could you explain what constitutes a "syntactical point of
>> view" in your book?
>
> I
Hello,
This is a feature I've wanted to add to LilyPond for a while, and I've
posted a patch set on Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1730044/show
Any comments are appreciated, especially regarding the syntactic
requirements of the new command.
Thanks,
Patrick
___
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> So I'd like to propose that we have the task of changing \eyeglasses from
> make-postscript-markup to 'path be a Frog task.
>
> Any takers?
I'll take care of it. I've added new issues to keep track of my progress:
http://code.google.com/p
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Pap Lôrinc wrote:
>> HTH
> - Thanks Carl, but I've applied the imagemagick patch, did a long clean and
> make all, but the make check failed in the same place.
>
> Version: ImageMagick 6.5.7-8 2009-11-26 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
> Copyright: Copyright (C) 19
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I'm trying to do regression test checking, but it doesn't seem to be working
> right.
>
> I did
>
> make test-baseline
>
> Then I switched to my new branch and did
>
> make && make check
>
> I found some differences, so I patched the code, th
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 6/17/10 9:48 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
>
>> On 17 June 2010 16:42, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>> The problem I have is that after the assertion fails, the temp directory is
>>> removed:
>>>
assert stat == 0
AssertionError
>>>
2010/6/6 josé henrique padovani :
> Em 06/06/10 15:33, Patrick McCarty escreveu:
>> Looking into this more, I see two issues:
>>
>> 1) What names should we use for the different linecap options?
>> 2) Where should these values be specified?
>>
>> Any thoughts
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
> I think that using 'path would be the better option, also the circles
> and semicircle will be a little tricky to code.
This should say "... though the circles and semicircle will be a
little tricky to code
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 6/6/10 7:36 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
>
>> 2010/6/4 Patrick McCarty :
>>
>>> Another option is to use the 'path routine. This isn't documented yet
>>> and is a little cumbersome to
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2010/6/4 Patrick McCarty :
>
>> Another option is to use the 'path routine. This isn't documented yet
>> and is a little cumbersome to use, but you can find an example that
>> uses 'path in this snip
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Since
> Issue 963: check dependency versions for 2.14
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963
> is closed, I am extremely reluctant to bump requirements now.
> According to configure.in,
> STEPMAKE_PATH_PROG(FONTFORGE
2010/6/6 Patrick McCarty :
> 2010/6/6 josé henrique padovani :
>> Just to be sure: Is it possible to set different caps with the path routine?
>> (I didn't found this option)
>> If not, would it be possible to add an optional variable to set it and have
>> it wor
2010/6/6 josé henrique padovani :
> Just to be sure: Is it possible to set different caps with the path routine?
> (I didn't found this option)
> If not, would it be possible to add an optional variable to set it and have
> it working on both ps and svg backends?
It's not possible right now, but I
2010/6/4 josé henrique padovani :
>
> I am trying to generate svg files of my score, where I use some \postscript
> markups. Everything goes ok, except those markups...
> I get this warning and the svg file comes without the postcript drawings...
> "warning: missing stencil expression `embedded-ps'
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is this patch correct?
>
> Interval has a default constructor, so in general addinig
> initialization is not necessary. Yo
on Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 13:30:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Initialize interval in grob_stencil_extent().
There is a chance of returning garbage values from grob_stencil_extent()
due to this uninitialized variable issue.
---
lily/grob.cc |2 +-
1 file
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
>> As I understand it, these are to get round problems with Guile pre V1.8,7,
>> which we no longer support. Is it now safe to delete this code?
>
> According to configure.in, we only req
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM, James Lowe wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Mark Polesky wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you guys not see Neil's reply?
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-05/msg8.html
>>>
>>> Cross-staff unstemmed tre
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I'm not certain it's a texi2html bug, or a bug in our texi2html init
> file, but either way it should be in the tracker.
>
> Bug Squad: please add this. Type-build, priority-medium.
Added as: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detai
On 2010-05-09, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> Sorry to do this, but we need another bug squad person, starting from
> 1 week ago and lasting until 1 month after 2.14.0. Patrick? Mark?
> Trevor? Any of you willing?
Sure, I could devote some time for this.
> We'll skip over the customary review of
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
> After looking through the regtest comparison for 2.13.19/2.13.20, I
> noticed that flag glyphs have changed shape. I posted a tracker issue
> for this:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1075
&g
1 - 100 of 787 matches
Mail list logo
