2010/6/6 josé henrique padovani <zepadov...@gmail.com>: > Em 06/06/10 15:33, Patrick McCarty escreveu: >> Looking into this more, I see two issues: >> >> 1) What names should we use for the different linecap options? >> 2) Where should these values be specified? >> >> Any thoughts (about syntax, or otherwise)? > > well.. I think that would be good to preserve the ps-like words (simply to > avoid confusion between svg and > ps syntaxes) > > It would be nice to add both "setlinecap" and "setlinejoin" to the 'path > defs... > They could be added as optional arguments (not sure about the guile syntax > as I am more > > (use-modules (ice-9 optargs)) ;; is this module already loaded by LilyPond? > (define* (path thickness exps #:optional cap join ) > > ...) > > or, using keywords (more elegant?)... and then if linecap or linejoin are > not supplied > by the user they can have their actual default values... (maybe path could > be extendend in this way?) > > (use-modules (ice-9 optargs)) ;; is this module already loaded by LilyPond? > (define my-proc (lambda* (thickness exps #&key linecap linejoin) > > .... > What do you think?
This looks like an easy way of implementing these extra configurable options. I've already started fiddling with the 'path routines, and I'll let you know when I have worked everything out. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
