https://codereview.appspot.com/5569045/diff/3001/input/regression/lilypond-book/GNUmakefile
File input/regression/lilypond-book/GNUmakefile (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/5569045/diff/3001/input/regression/lilypond-book/GNUmakefile#newcode36
input/regression/lilypond-book/GNUmakefile:36
Don't think it needs another countdown cycle, so the changes below could
be made before pushing.
Cheers,
Julien
https://codereview.appspot.com/112280043/diff/40001/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right):
https://codereview.apps
Thanks for this! Some comments.
Cheers,
Julien
https://codereview.appspot.com/112280043/diff/20001/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/112280043/diff/20001/Documentation/contributor/administra
On 2014/05/18 12:12:27, hanwenn wrote:
according to git it was Julien.
lgtm
https://codereview.appspot.com/99300043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I have forked gub and have been working on it for a while now.
>
> https://github.com/jjbenham/gub
>
> It is very different now from https://github.com/gperciva/gub and the
> main master. I don't know how to contribute changes unless via p
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> That's not quite the same as "we already have hosting, a platform for
> contribution and review comments". Everything beyond the content in
> private repositories is gone if a project is removed. And "we have" is
> a bit of a euphemism
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Julien Rioux writes:
>
> > The current hosting situation isn't bad that we need to take such
> > important actions with savannah. With github, we already have hosting,
> > a platform for contribution and re
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 04:41:46PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
> > I think the following would be a good 1-2 punch approach for the
> > current development cycle: First, upgrade python in GUB and make
> > sure we can
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:24 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Julien Rioux writes:
>
> > (BTW moving GUB to a user-agnostic home such as
> > https://github.com/lilypond
>
> > would make sense to avoid such confusion. After Jan went mostly
> > inactive, Graham took ov
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> I was of the opinion that GUB already uses Python 2.6?
>
>
GUB master at https://github.com/gperciva/gub (the current "official" home)
definitely does not use python 2.6. It ships python 2.4.5
If you are using GUB master at https://github.c
Hi,
Our python scripts currently require a python2 interpreter with version
at least 2.4, but by bumping the requirement to 2.6 we could start
introducing
from __future__ import print_function
which will be one of the major step towards supporting both python2 and
python3 interpreters with a
On 29/10/2013 4:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Julien Rioux writes:
On 27/10/2013 2:09 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
That's good, but the most irritating thing about this patch is not
that i have to solve merge conflicts. I'm mainly irritated because a
piece of solid code (maybe it'
On 27/10/2013 2:09 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
That's good, but the most irritating thing about this patch is not
that i have to solve merge conflicts. I'm mainly irritated because a
piece of solid code (maybe it's not as solid as i think, but to know
that i need _reviews_) is laying dormant for *h
Reviewers: John Mandereau,
Message:
Thanks to Thomas Klausner. This seems like the correct fix.
Cheers,
Julien
Description:
Build: Fix compilation with GNU make 4.0
Fix "recipes commence before first target" error.
Patch from Thomas Klausner.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.
https://codereview.appspot.com/13854043/diff/16001/Documentation/GNUmakefile
File Documentation/GNUmakefile (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/13854043/diff/16001/Documentation/GNUmakefile#newcode283
Documentation/GNUmakefile:283: $(outdir)/contributor.texi:
$(outdir)/ly-grammar.txt
On 2013
https://codereview.appspot.com/13854043/diff/7001/Documentation/GNUmakefile
File Documentation/GNUmakefile (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/13854043/diff/7001/Documentation/GNUmakefile#newcode283
Documentation/GNUmakefile:283: $(outdir)/contributor.texi:
$(outdir)/ly-grammar.txt
On 2013/1
Again, can we add a check if there is already a numbered backup around?
Make numbered backups for files that have numbered backups already.
Otherwise, make single backups. This is the default.
That would mean:
https://codereview.appspot.com/14040043/diff/6001/scripts/convert-ly.py
File
lgtm
Cheers,
Julien
https://codereview.appspot.com/14077043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
This suggestion from David sounded like a good default:
Make numbered backups for files that have numbered backups already.
https://codereview.appspot.com/14040043/diff/1/scripts/convert-ly.py
File scripts/convert-ly.py (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/14040043/diff/1/scripts/convert-ly
LGTM. You might want to add to your comment at the top: "Also convert
the file to Unix line endings."
https://codereview.appspot.com/13720049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 12/09/2013 6:09 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
2013/8/3 Federico Bruni mailto:fedel...@gmail.com>>
I'm getting this error if I run ./autogen.sh in git master:
ERROR: Please install required programs: International New Century
Schoolbook fonts International New Century Schoolbook font
Reviewers: John Mandereau,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Build dependencies for metafont files (issue 779).
Write .dep files containing make dependency rules for .mf files,
allowing to simply type `make' to process the fonts after changing
an input'ed file and have the fonts updated with
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I don't understand what you're fixing here, Julien. On my machine,
> deleting the build directory completely, then recreating it and running
> make (-j9 of course) completely rebuilds the binaries in a single pass.
> Further immediate calls
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:19 PM, James wrote:
> Julien,
>
> I just had a bit of a shock when I ran the test-patchy script - then
> realized that I had inadvertently added an extra character before running
> the script
>
> --snip--
> jlowe@jlowe26vm ~/lilypond-extra/patches (master)$ ./test-patche
On 11/09/2013 2:38 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
But now I'm curious, how do I get fc-list to "see" the
fonts in the gsfonts directory?
Looks like you have to run fc-cache to update the
database. Something like: sudo fc-cache -fsv
Julien and David,
I'll
On 2013/09/11 18:54:01, Mark Polesky wrote:
personally, I would find this wording more intuitive:
same as `make all', but restricted to the current directory
Sounds good.
Although... I guess `make local-all' and `make default' do the same
thing?
Maybe you could just say
same as
Reviewers: John Mandereau, lemzwerg,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Build everything on the first pass of make.
Everything should be built and up-to-date after a one-shot `make' call.
Currently, this is not the case: fonts are being rebuilt on the secnod
pass. This required a dependency f
Reviewers: dak, lemzwerg,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Disallow metapost versions 1.504 < x < 1.803.
Add a check in ./configure to avoid these buggy
versions of metapost:
1.504 < mpost --version < 1.803
Fixes issue 3539:
Configure should forbid mpost 1.802 from TexLive 2013
http://cod
Updated to be purely documentational.
https://codereview.appspot.com/13290047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 11/09/2013 3:28 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
So, after Julien's patch
https://codereview.appspot.com/13390043
I finally get a proper error at the configure stage:
ERROR: Please install required programs: International
New Century Schoolbook fonts (make sure the fc-list
utility can s
Reviewers: dak,
Message:
On 2013/09/06 16:39:24, dak wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/13290047/diff/1/stepmake/stepmake/generic-targets.make
File stepmake/stepmake/generic-targets.make (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/13290047/diff/1/stepmake/stepmake/generic-targets.make#newcode
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/13475043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
See http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3528
https://codereview.appspot.com/13466043/diff/2001/stepmake/stepmake/c++-rules.make
File stepmake/stepmake/c++-rules.make (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/13466043/diff/2001/stepmake/stepmake/c++-rules.make#newcode16
stepmake/ste
On 21/08/2013 12:32 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Please read
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor-big-page.html#summary-for-experienced-developers
and start using git-cl. Plain patches posted to -devel tend to get forgotten
in mist of syntax changes and font standards debates.
On 20/08/2013 3:00 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Dear all,
The header tie-column-format.hh is unused. tie-column-format.cc was
removed in 2.10 and removing the header does not prevent lilypond to
build. Only 2 files were including it without actually using it.
Here is the proposed patch.
Frédéric
On 20/08/2013 9:00 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
However, I (and, from what I've seen, David K, and
almost certainly Graham and probably Julien) would strongly oppose adding
extra complexity to the already over-complex build system.
I actually don't mind this, provided I can turn it off. I think it's
On 2013/08/17 12:29:08, Julien Rioux wrote:
It looks like we can download individual patches for each file,
so maybe we can use this with Patchy somehow,
I've updated Patchy to handle the "too large to download" patchset. You
can review here: https://github.com/gperciva/lilypon
Reviewers: janek, Graham Percival,
Message:
On 2013/08/16 04:45:59, Graham Percival wrote:
When building with WEBSITE_ONLY_BUILD, $(PYTHON) will default to
python (as
defined at the top of the file). We do that because we don't run
./configure on
the web server.
I _think_ this will be sa
On 2013/08/17 11:31:41, PhilEHolmes wrote:
The patch set on Rietveld now includes the new images (thanks,
Julien).
hmm, the images are there, we can see them in the side-by-side diffs...
but for the patch, Rietveld says "Patch set is too large to download".
Bummer. It looks like we can download
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:03:31PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
> > As far as I know, 1.9 is the development series culminating in the
> > stable 2.0, so while 1.9 is not all too likely to be installed on
> > current systems, allowing/preferr
On 20/07/2013 5:00 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
On 13/07/13 20:51, Frédéric Bron wrote:
I don't think ./configure should do this automatically, but at
the very least, it should fail when it finds a guile version that
is incompatible with our source code. Can you please open an
issue for it\?
good poin
On 18/07/2013 11:46 AM, James wrote:
On 18/07/13 16:08, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Julien Rioux"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Unable to run test patchy - URI changed for tracker?
On 18/07/2013 11:00 AM, Phil Ho
On 18/07/2013 11:00 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Julien Rioux"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Unable to run test patchy - URI changed for tracker?
On 18/07/2013 2:39 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:48:
On 18/07/2013 2:39 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:48:52PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Three options I can think of. 1) use something other than Google.
[...]
3) "Screen scrape".
I'd be seriously concerned about breakage. That said, it wouldn't
be too bad if we used a
On 13/07/2013 6:52 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
I read also that:
"The packages will have to be patched to Require and BuildRequire the
compat-guile18(-devel) package. Furthermore, they will have to be
patched (if necessary) to use the renamed autotools macros. The
patches to spec files and autotools
On 13/07/2013 3:19 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
I can now build lilypond and compile at least the simple score { c }
But when I do my build process:
export GUILE=/usr/bin/guile1.8
export GUILE_CONFIG=/usr/bin/guile1.8-config
export GUILE_TOOLS=/usr/bin/guile1.8-tools
sh autogen.sh --noconfigure
mkd
On 12/06/2013 2:27 PM, James wrote:
Nice. But where are the images of the score?
;)
http://www.liedboek.nl/voorbeelden/proefbundel
It looks really nice :)
--
Julien
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/ma
On 16/03/2013 6:27 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
/usr/bin/python -tt
/home/david/lilypond-git/scripts/build/create-weblinks-itexi.py >
out-www/weblinks.itexi
make[3]: *** No rule to make target
`/home/david/lilypond-git/Documentation/cs/web/news-front.itexi', needed by
`out-www/web.texi'. Stop.
Tr
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2013/3/12 Julien Rioux :
>> OK I see, so testing for the binaries is not enough. We`ll need to
>> find out what else is required and add a test for it. Does anybody
>> know? If you or anyone else do uninstall texlive
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2013/3/12 Julien Rioux :
>> On 02/03/2013 11:54 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello. When trying to build lilypond, I had to install the
>>> texlive-metapost package which the autogen.sh did not ask f
On 02/03/2013 11:54 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
Hello. When trying to build lilypond, I had to install the
texlive-metapost package which the autogen.sh did not ask for. Is this
a flaw of the config process?
Actually, ./configure is checking for both mf and mpost. Do you still
have a config.log
On 01/03/2013 2:15 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
4 files attached. To try this out: create a new directory and place
NoTagline.ly in it. Create a subdirectory called input and put some
regtest files in there. Run MakeOldPix.sh. Make a change to lilypond.
Run MakeNewPix.sh. Run ComparePix.sh. Om my
On 05/03/2013 11:07 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
2013/3/3 James :
On 2 March 2013 16:54, Francisco Vila wrote:
Hello. When trying to build lilypond, I had to install the
texlive-metapost package which the autogen.sh did not ask for. Is this
a flaw of the config process?
Well when I follow the
Reitveld -> Rietveld
https://codereview.appspot.com/7101048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
At this point, the git-cl used by the project has been sufficiently
geared towards lilypond development that I somewhat doubt anybody is
using it for work outside of lilypond. It might not make sense at all
for "our" git-cl to keep asking these superfluous questions; should they
be remove entirely
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7021043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
>> I missed that Bertrand Bordage, Joe Neeman, and Carl D. Sorensen are
>> listed both under "developers" and "contributors". According to the
>> policy they should be removed from "contributors". Al
I missed that Bertrand Bordage, Joe Neeman, and Carl D. Sorensen are
listed both under "developers" and "contributors". According to the
policy they should be removed from "contributors". Also Colin Hall is
listed under "developers" so probably should not be added under
"contributors: bug squad" l
On 10/17/2012 02:55 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
Julien,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
On 16/10/2012 4:36 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
david@david-desktop ~/lilypond-git (dev/measure_counter)$ git cl issue
2445
Issue number: 2445 (http://codereview.appspot.com/2445
On 16/10/2012 4:36 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
david@david-desktop ~/lilypond-git (dev/measure_counter)$ git cl issue 2445
Issue number: 2445 (http://codereview.appspot.com/2445)
This should be the issue number from the Rietveld page, not the one from
google code page.
--
Julien
_
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:18 PM, wrote:
> Sorry, there's a bit of confusion here. The past policy was:
Thanks, I've updated the file to clarify the policy and made sure that
I do not move contributors from past to current but simply add them to
current.
Cheers,
Julien
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:40 AM, wrote:
> this looks strange: when i go to side-by-side diffs, i don't see any
> changes, just "error: old chunk mismatch".
I don't know what caused that, but you can rely on the raw patch set.
Since this patch only adds lines and does not remove any lines, the
re
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:08 PM, wrote:
> The changelog says
>
> "Don't update \version when no rule is applied."
>
> That's what the existing -d --diff-version-update command does. If this
> is intended to be the default behaviour now, then the command-line
> option should be removed.
No, -d do
On 07/10/2012 5:33 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "James" ;
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [talk] why it'd be great to have web interface for
submittingsimple doc patches
On 10/06/2012 05:46 PM
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:06 AM, wrote:
> Are you going to report the number of errors using the `errors'
> variable? In case this is true, I would consider this a bad idea, since
> you abuse the functionality of the exit status.
>
> How large can `errors' become? The value returned by `exit' mu
Try to add a regression test example with a valid lilypond block
inbetween two multiline comments.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6584073/diff/1/python/book_latex.py
File python/book_latex.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6584073/diff/1/python/book_latex.py#newcode88
python/book_latex.p
Reviewers: ,
Message:
For review:
Description:
convert-ly:
- Exit with error status when errors occur.
- Use unicode strings for file names printing.
- Don't update \version when no rule is applied.
This fixes issue 2670.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/
Affecte
On 08/08/2012 4:59 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
I've been looking at how the regression test comparison works. The
first thing I find is that we have 2 effectively duplicate, but
different, pages on running regtest comparisons:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/verify-regression
On 20/08/2012 8:53 AM, James wrote:
John,
On 20 August 2012 13:09, John Mandereau wrote:
Hi James,
Il giorno lun, 20/08/2012 alle 10.40 +0100, James ha scritto:
I am not able to work out how to force patchy during a test-patches.py
to also make doc as well as the test and test-baseline.
I do
Hi Patrick,
A cleaned up version of this patch has been committed (and credited to
you), so you may close this Rietveld issue. You will see the fix in
version 2.15.41, the next development release.
Cheers,
Julien
http://codereview.appspot.com/5697059/
__
On 25/06/2012 1:53 PM, John Mandereau wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/06/2012 alle 18.50 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
And John M could no doubt help. It's a question of how much time they have
to contribute.
If what we want to achieve is well enough specified, then I can offer to
go for it.
Cheers
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
On 2012/06/22 08:19:29, Graham Percival wrote:
I thought that bash doesn't need the shebang in some cases? at least,
I could
have sworn that I never added the shebang in this case?
As I understand it, problems ensue when you try to call that script from
Reviewers: MikeSol, Graham Percival,
Message:
On 2012/06/22 08:20:56, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM, although I'd personally have prepended "musicxml2ly:" to the
beginning of
the patch subject line. That makes it much more obvious when skimming
the git
history (or just available patches to re
On 26/04/2012 5:53 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Hey all,
My website build crashes with:
mikesol@mikesol-laptop:~/lilypond-git$ sudo make
LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=/home/mikesol/lilypond-extra website
make --no-builtin-rules config_make=./config.make \
top-src-dir=/home/mikesol/
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Julien Rioux"
> To: ; ;
> ; ; ;
>
>
>> > A snippet with a deprecated option, triggering compatibility mode:
>> >
>> > -\lilypond[11pt,fragment]{c&#x
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5967060/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 2:32 PM, wrote:
> Reviewers: Julien Rioux, Graham Percival, dak,
>
> Message:
> Please review
>
> Description:
> These files used what appears to be a deprecated syntax to invoke
> lilypond-book, resulting in these warnings:
>
> lilypond-b
On 27/03/2012 3:20 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
2012/3/27 Julien Rioux
On 27/03/2012 2:58 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
However, I cannot find the log file :(
On a default configuration this logfile would be in
/tmp/lilypond-autobuild
Cheers,
Julien
Here it is:
http://gregoriana.sk/data/log-None
On 27/03/2012 2:58 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
2012/3/27 James
I reset one of mine on the countdown
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216
Try that.
This is the output:
Trying issue 2216
Found patch: (2216, '/home/marek/lilypond-patchy/issue5843060_6001.diff',
'AU: Documen
On 26/03/2012 8:42 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
ge.ja.html
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.35/Documentation/misc/browser-language.nl.html
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.35/input/regression/lilypond-book/include/example.ly
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.35/input
On 27/03/2012 9:37 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
commit ee70161485a2d2f347db3e29724a943c741ef524
Author: Julien Rioux
Date: Wed Mar 21 09:13:55 2012 -0400
Regtests for lilypond-book include files located in subdir.
causes the regtests to fail. Rerunning configure
On 27/03/2012 1:48 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
Hi,
2012/3/23 Graham Percival
Well, you need to figure out why
git fetch
in your $LILYPOND_GIT repository fails.
git fetch works now...
I need som new patch for play with...
Marek
___
lilypond-deve
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5874044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:12 AM, wrote:
> Awesome work as always. There's some unintended (and bad) changes to
> GNUmakefile.in.
>
That's a mistake when I uploaded (pointing to the wrong commit in
git-cl upload). Just trust me that I won't commit this, but I am not
uploading again in order to g
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:33 AM, wrote:
> I'm seeing "old chunk mismatch" for this patch. Could you try uploading
> it again to a new rietveld issue?
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5846075/
Fixed, it was a bad upload (no need for a new issue number).
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, wrote:
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/5846075/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py
>> File scripts/lilypond-book.py (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/584607
Are the changes to .gitignore intentional?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5862052/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:33 PM, wrote:
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/5870043/diff/1/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
>> File python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5843069/diff/17/Documentation/common-macros.itexi
> File Documentation/common-macros.itexi (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5843069/diff/17/Documentation/common-macros.itexi#newcode185
> Documentation/common-macro
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:33 PM, wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5870043/diff/1/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
> File python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5870043/diff/1/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py#newcode71
> python/auxiliar/postpro
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5846075/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py
> File scripts/lilypond-book.py (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5846075/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py#newcode639
> scripts/lilypond-book.py:639: global_options.include_pa
On 20/03/2012 4:26 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
Hi,
2012/3/16 Graham Percival
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote:
I can do it, I think (almost every day).
Great! Here's the link to get started:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy
... although
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:07 PM, wrote:
> LGTM
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5843069/
Thanks for having a look. By the way, it looks like
http://lilypond.org/website just replicates http://lilypong.org at a
deeper level -- any reason why this is so? Is that from before the
switch to the new
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:24:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > I find that in my patchy runs, I get directories
> > /tmp/lilypond-autobuild (my configured build directory)
> > and a hierarchy of "build" directories under it, possibly one per tested
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:49 PM, wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5848056/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py
> File scripts/lilypond-book.py (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5848056/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py#newcode104
> scripts/lilypond-book.py:104: progress(_ ('%s (GNU Lily
this rietveld issue can be closed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5500069/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2012/01/03 20:36:48, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:31:54PM +, mailto:hashas...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Sorry, didn't understand what you mean by "add issue 2166 to track
this"
It's not relevant unless you're going to be making other patches.
If you are, read the "summar
On 16/03/2012 5:16 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
There are a few organisations interesting for lilypond hackers:
inkscape (to learn about svg), closure (to learn a scheme-like
language), buildbot (could be helpful but we already have the gran
unified builder).
libreoffice (improve the lilypond
On 16/03/2012 4:55 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote:
I can do it, I think (almost every day).
Great! Here's the link to get started:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy
... although apparently that doesn't incl
On 16/03/2012 4:45 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, "no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com"
wrote:
Thank you for submitting "LilyPond" organization application to Google
Summer of Code 2012.
Unfortunately, we were unable t
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
