How does one raise issues for the GUB github repo gperciva/gub? It would
appear that function has been disabled for that repo.
Andrew
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Oops - the dev user and password is given on github.
Andrew
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 at 12:33, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> Re hanging VM, I tried downloading the Fedora VM for 0.2 release. It
> worked fine. I redownloaded the Debian release for 0.3 and now it works
> fine. Given the SHA sum file is wro
Re hanging VM, I tried downloading the Fedora VM for 0.2 release. It worked
fine. I redownloaded the Debian release for 0.3 and now it works fine.
Given the SHA sum file is wrong and that you can't check the download, I
wonder if the first two downloads were corrupt (although I very, very
rarely se
Am Sa., 15. Dez. 2018 um 21:45 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
> I now try
>
> make lilypond
>
> We'll see what happens ...
It fails very soon with the error already reported here
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/What-linux-to-use-for-GUB-builds-make-lilypond-runs-into-KeyError-glibc-doc-when-us
Am Sa., 15. Dez. 2018 um 22:39 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > I tried to join the party about GUB.
> > So far I have a successful 'make bootstrap'
> >
> > As a next step the CG says:
> > "
> > Once this has completed successfully, you can build the LilyPond
> > release
Thomas Morley writes:
> I tried to join the party about GUB.
> So far I have a successful 'make bootstrap'
>
> As a next step the CG says:
> "
> Once this has completed successfully, you can build the LilyPond
> release package. However, this uses an archived version of the
> regression tests, so
Hi,
I tried to join the party about GUB.
So far I have a successful 'make bootstrap'
As a next step the CG says:
"
Once this has completed successfully, you can build the LilyPond
release package. However, this uses an archived version of the
regression tests, so it is better to download this fir
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
the 18th of December,
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
Push:
No patches to push at this time.
Countdow
I've noticed that gs-9.26 cannot embed CID fonts
for the extractpdfmark method.
In the method, we defined fonts in PostScript, and use it in PDF.
gs-9.26 cannot define the fonts for PDF in PostScript.
https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700367#c4
To define fonts for ghostscript,
root pri
message: On 2018/12/13 12:26:07, Valentin Villenave wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/348060043/diff/1/ly/chord-modifiers-init.ly
File ly/chord-modifiers-init.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/348060043/diff/1/ly/chord-modifiers-init.ly#newcode49
ly/chord-modifiers-init.ly:49: 1
https://codereview.appspot.com/348050043/diff/1/ly/property-init.ly
File ly/property-init.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/348050043/diff/1/ly/property-init.ly#newcode34
ly/property-init.ly:34: ambitusAfterKeySignature = {
On 2018/12/15 10:40:36, Malte Meyn wrote:
Is this the correct
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This doesn’t change LilyPond’s default behaviour (well, except for some
slight horizontal spacing changes; the Ambitus hadn’t been centered
between LeftEdge and Clef). Should it because Ambitus after the
KeySignature makes more sense (looking at accidentals …) for some
peopl
Thanks for the review Malte
https://codereview.appspot.com/349810043/diff/1/ly/hel-arabic.ly
File ly/hel-arabic.ly (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/349810043/diff/1/ly/hel-arabic.ly#oldcode73
ly/hel-arabic.ly:73: %% Sajakar: c' d' edb' f' g' ab' b' c'' c'' bb' a'
g' f' edb' d' c'
On 2018/
13 matches
Mail list logo
