2017-10-10 22:53 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Knut Petersen writes:
>
>> Am 10.10.2017 um 20:56 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>>> Also, it's the question which guile-version we should aim at.
>>> Antonio's patches are made for guile-2.0, but guile-2.2 is far more
>>> promising, imho.
>>
>> About a year ag
Knut Petersen writes:
> Am 10.10.2017 um 20:56 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> Also, it's the question which guile-version we should aim at.
>> Antonio's patches are made for guile-2.0, but guile-2.2 is far more
>> promising, imho.
>
> About a year ago guile 2.0 was terribly slow. Is there any progress
Am 10.10.2017 um 20:56 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Also, it's the question which guile-version we should aim at.
Antonio's patches are made for guile-2.0, but guile-2.2 is far more
promising, imho.
About a year ago guile 2.0 was terribly slow. Is there any progress?
Knut
__
2017-10-10 15:25 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Karlin High writes:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
>>> Thank you Karlin, I've started having a look at it, but I don't have
>>> much spare time these days... The main problem with LilyDev master
>>> (version 5) is that it'
Reviewers: dak,
Message:
On 2017/10/10 16:29:05, dak wrote:
I think this approach is a rather bad tradeoff between additional
context
properties and actual flexibility: it still only allows for a very
limited
subset of metronome marks.
That’s true. BTW, I don’t even know why tempoHideNote
I think this approach is a rather bad tradeoff between additional
context properties and actual flexibility: it still only allows for a
very limited subset of metronome marks.
I think it would make sense to check all forms a \tempo mark currently
can take and then see what principal forms those c
Il giorno mar 10 ott 2017 alle 13:52, Karlin High
ha scritto:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Federico Bruni
wrote:
Thank you Karlin, I've started having a look at it, but I don't
have much
spare time these days...
The main problem with LilyDev master (version 5) is that it's meant
fo
Karlin High writes:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> Thank you Karlin, I've started having a look at it, but I don't have
>> much spare time these days... The main problem with LilyDev master
>> (version 5) is that it's meant for guile-2 migration (which seems
>> stop
On 10.10.2017 13:57, Malte Meyn wrote:
I made a patch for this (only snippet 1008, not yet 574). Because
that’s not a bugfix but an extension to LilyPond, should this first be
discussed on this list or on the issue tracker? Or should I upload it
right now to Rietveld and discuss then?
Especi
Hi list,
I made a patch for this (only snippet 1008, not yet 574). Because that’s
not a bugfix but an extension to LilyPond, should this first be
discussed on this list or on the issue tracker? Or should I upload it
right now to Rietveld and discuss then?
Cheers,
Malte
Weitergeleit
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Thank you Karlin, I've started having a look at it, but I don't have much
> spare time these days...
> The main problem with LilyDev master (version 5) is that it's meant for
> guile-2 migration (which seems stopped), but I guess that most o
Il giorno ven 6 ott 2017 alle 21:25, Karlin High
ha scritto:
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Federico Bruni
wrote:
Anyway, if we decide that the setup script in LilyDev should
include your
proposal, I'll be happy to see a pull request
https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDev/pull/8
If you
12 matches
Mail list logo
