Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> writes: > Am 10.10.2017 um 20:56 schrieb Thomas Morley: >> Also, it's the question which guile-version we should aim at. >> Antonio's patches are made for guile-2.0, but guile-2.2 is far more >> promising, imho. > > About a year ago guile 2.0 was terribly slow. Is there any progress?
Respective to 2.0, yes. But it's still decidedly awful compared to 1.8 as used in LilyPond. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
