On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 12:25 PM, wrote:
> This kind of addition would likely get
> the most useful feedback from people *teaching* LilyPond. We don't have
> a lot of those unless you count "batch teachers", namely documentation
> writers.
Paco would be the obvious person to ask. (Hi Paco!)
Spe
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> As promised, a starter list of requirements for the issue handling system,
> to allow us to check potential replacements to Google code.
Hi Phil, thanks for this recap.
This may well be a stupid question, and if so please forgive me, but:
many
Looks good! Thanks for posting it. A couple of comments included.
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/diff/1/input/regression/stencil-scale.ly
File input/regression/stencil-scale.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/diff/1/input/regression/stencil-scale.ly#newcode8
input
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/diff/1/input/regression/stencil-scale.ly
File input/regression/stencil-scale.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/diff/1/input/regression/stencil-scale.ly#newcode8
input/regression/stencil-scale.ly:8: its bounding box.)"
Please use
Please review, thanks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> On May 4, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
>
> They both have highlighting for c++, .css, and .py files,
> gedit also has it for .scm, .itexi, .itely, and .make files,
> but geany doesn’t have it for these.
> (And neither has it for .ly files.)
This was from the default LilyDev2 with gea
Hi Federico,
> On May 4, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
>
> Hi Paul, thanks for the suggestions.
>
> As Debian Jessie was released few days ago, I was thinking about a new
> LilyDev.
Hey, that’s great timing!
> I think I'll first upgrade to a more recent version of live-build and t
> On May 3, 2015, at 11:02 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> I think that it would be great to have you prepare patches for the CG.
> The CG is the least-reviewed manual in our set, so it's probably the
> easiest manual for which to get patches approved.
Will do, once this discussion winds down, and
> On May 3, 2015, at 6:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> CG 3.3.4 Making Patches
>> "git format-patch origin" doesn't work if you type it in literally,
>> but gives "ambiguous argument 'origin' " message.
>
> Shouldn't happen unless you managed to create either a local branch
> named "origin" or
https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc
File lily/beaming-pattern.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc#newcode170
lily/beaming-pattern.cc:170: int start_dur =
intlog2(static_cast(infos_[i+1].start_moment_.main_part_.d
https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc
File lily/beaming-pattern.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc#newcode170
lily/beaming-pattern.cc:170: int start_dur =
intlog2(static_cast(infos_[i+1].start_moment_.main_part_.d
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I noticed these recently and it seemed appropriate to fix them this way.
Description:
silence C++ warnings
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/
Affected files (+2, -2 lines):
M lily/beaming-pattern.cc
M lily/page-breaking.cc
Index: lily/be
On 5/4/15 3:44 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>Trevor Daniels wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 10:01 PM
>
>> OK, I've created a project on SourceForge and started
>> downloading the issues DB from GoogleCode.
>[snip]
>> You can see the progress here:
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/tickets
On 5/4/15 4:25 PM, "Dan Eble" wrote:
>> But anyways, the main point of this email is to point out that pushing
>> debian could cost you developers - I don't know how many people like me
>> there are out there, but if I have to use a debian-based system my
>> reaction is likely to be "thanks but n
> But anyways, the main point of this email is to point out that pushing
> debian could cost you developers - I don't know how many people like me
> there are out there, but if I have to use a debian-based system my
> reaction is likely to be "thanks but no thanks". (That said, I think a
The data
Wols Lists writes:
> On 04/05/15 04:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>> 2. Compiling with LilyDev (2.3) and Compiling (4.x)
>> 2.3 is about getting it set up with LilyDev. 4.x is about general work
>> whether with or without LilyDev. We are much stronger about recommending
>> the use of LilyDev than w
On 04/05/15 22:39, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 04/05/15 04:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>> 2. Compiling with LilyDev (2.3) and Compiling (4.x)
>> 2.3 is about getting it set up with LilyDev. 4.x is about general work
>> whether with or without LilyDev. We are much stronger about recommending
>> the use o
Trevor Daniels wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 10:01 PM
> OK, I've created a project on SourceForge and started
> downloading the issues DB from GoogleCode.
[snip]
> You can see the progress here:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/tickets/
Update: (one ladder, two snakes)
1. I now see that
On 04/05/15 04:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> 2. Compiling with LilyDev (2.3) and Compiling (4.x)
> 2.3 is about getting it set up with LilyDev. 4.x is about general work
> whether with or without LilyDev. We are much stronger about recommending
> the use of LilyDev than we were when the CG was orig
On 04/05/15 22:01, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> You can see the progress here:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/tickets/
I'm getting
Error 403
Read access required
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu
Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 8:40 PM
> So perhaps it would be a good idea to test Allura
> on SourceForge, and see if we like it. If we do,
> then we could let the Savannah people know, and
> maybe they'd be willing to use it as their issue tracker.
OK, I've created a project on Sou
On 5/4/15 1:16 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>Carl Sorensen
>
>> I'm fine if we can get everything on Savannah, but it seems
>> to me that in the past, there was a feeling that Savane's
>> bug tracking was significantly inferior to Google Code.
>> I don't know, because I never used it.
>
>Just
Carl Sorensen
> I'm fine if we can get everything on Savannah, but it seems
> to me that in the past, there was a feeling that Savane's
> bug tracking was significantly inferior to Google Code.
> I don't know, because I never used it.
Just as a reminder, we had a very helpful interchange with
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 5/4/15 10:21 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>If we have a really viable migration path out of non-Savannah hosting,
>>it seems like putting our eggs not in too many outsourced baskets
>>might save us from some future headaches like the Google code one.
>
> I'm not sure
On 5/4/15 10:16 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>Ah, wait .. sourceforce have an importer from GoogleCode. I had to
>register to see it, but that's easy. After that, it's here
>
>https://sourceforge.net/p/import_project/google-code/
>
>It says it will import Wiki pages, source code (SVN, Git or Hg),
On 5/4/15 10:21 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
>software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
>between the various versions and what that might mean for our chances of
>getting this system adopted by Sava
On 5/4/15 11:19 AM, "Federico Bruni" wrote:
>So I'd rather put a script to download the repository when the user logs
>in
>for the first time.
>What do you think?
Isn't that the way it works right now? If not, it certainly should.
There should be a script that configures git properly (i.e. with
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To: "Paul Morris"
Cc: "LilyPond Development Team"
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: Improving the Contributors Guide and LilyDev
2015-05-04 18:32 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni :
As Debian Jessie was released few days ago, I was
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 5:21 PM
>
>> Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
>> software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
>> between the various versions and what that might mean for our chances
2015-05-04 18:32 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni :
> As Debian Jessie was released few days ago, I was thinking about a new
> LilyDev.
> I think I'll first upgrade to a more recent version of live-build and then
> add the modifications you are suggesting.
>
I have a question: does anybody use LilyDev as
David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 5:21 PM
> Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
> software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
> between the various versions and what that might mean for our chances of
> getting this system adopted
Hi Paul, thanks for the suggestions.
As Debian Jessie was released few days ago, I was thinking about a new
LilyDev.
I think I'll first upgrade to a more recent version of live-build and then
add the modifications you are suggesting.
2015-05-04 0:09 GMT+02:00 Paul Morris :
> A. Suggestions for L
Sorry if this raises old stuff again.
For me many of your requirwments could be rather easily (and partially
automatically ) be handled with an integrated system of code, review and
issues, i.e. a system that provides something like pull requests.
In addition to many of your list items this woul
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Federico Bruni wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 2:53 PM
>
>> Interesting!
>> https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/
>>
>> I think that the main alternatives are Launchpad (Affero GPL) and Apache
>> Allura (Apache License).
>> Launchpad provides also the host
Federico Bruni wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 2:53 PM
> Interesting!
> https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/
>
> I think that the main alternatives are Launchpad (Affero GPL) and Apache
> Allura (Apache License).
> Launchpad provides also the hosting, while Allura should be deploye
As promised, a starter list of requirements for the issue handling system,
to allow us to check potential replacements to Google code.
1. Allow creation of a new sequentially numbered issue, with
text describing the issue’s title and details
2. Allow tagging the issue with a range of
2015-05-04 14:46 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen :
> More hunting around on Savannah led me to Apache Allura, which is claimed
> to be an open-source (Apache license) follow-on to the
> proprietary-software SourceForge.
>
> It uses git, has webhooks (
> https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Webhoo
Reviewers: J_lowe,
Message:
I've pushed to staging branch.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=f758afb1497e9d95e564844363f23efa5a313321
Description:
Fix lilypond-invoke-editor's temp dir
To use environment variable TMP and TEMP is
Windows-only conventions.
The POSIX c
On 5/3/15 9:48 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>In searching around on Savannah's page, I found InDefero
>http://www.indefero.net/ which claims to be an open-source lightweight
>copy of Google Code. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that there are any
>publicly available hosting sites using it, so
Reviewers: dak, Trevor Daniels, J_lowe,
Message:
Please review
Description:
Docstring and index entries added
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/232180043/
Affected files (+4, -0 lines):
M Documentation/notation/ancient.itely
M ly/property-init.ly
Index: Documentation/n
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 11:30 AM
>
>> Anyone evaluated/tested/whatever Kallithea?
>> https://kallithea-scm.org/>. It seems aligned to the Software
>> Freedom Convervancy, so maybe we could get Savannah to support it if it
>> does the job.
>
> Kallithea
David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 11:30 AM
> Anyone evaluated/tested/whatever Kallithea?
> https://kallithea-scm.org/>. It seems aligned to the Software
> Freedom Convervancy, so maybe we could get Savannah to support it if it
> does the job.
Kallithea doesn't seem to have a native issue
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 5/3/15 8:33 AM, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
> wrote:
>
>>On 10/04/15 09:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> So the question is whether Launchpad has a usable API, right? Joseph,
>>> do you know more?c
>>
>>Just to follow up on this, I exchanged a few messages on Reddit with
>
k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
On 2015/05/03 20:25:22, dak wrote:
On 2015/05/03 16:42:02, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I find it awkward when \absolute c'' and \absolute g'' mean exactly
the same
thing. But it's not like I could not live with it. But I still
would
recommend
just using c to kee
Dan Eble writes:
> On May 3, 2015, at 16:42 , David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Dan Eble writes:
>>
>>> Adding a wrapper context will have undesirable effects.
>>
>> The question is what requirements or mechanisms we could employ in order
>> to remove the undesirable effects.
>>
>> For example, it
Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 4:48 AM
> In searching around on Savannah's page, I found InDefero
> http://www.indefero.net/ which claims to be an open-source lightweight
> copy of Google Code. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that there are any
> publicly available hosting sites using
46 matches
Mail list logo
